Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34135006›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

The HexMaze: A Previous Knowledge Task on Map Learning for Mice.

Alejandra Alonso, Levan Bokeria, Jacqueline van der Meij, Anumita Samanta, Ronny Eichler, Ali Lotfi, Patrick Spooner, Irene Navarro Lobato, Lisa Genzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alejandra AlonsoDonders Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Levan BokeriaDonders Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline van der MeijDonders Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anumita SamantaDonders Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ronny EichlerDonders Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ali LotfiDonders Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Patrick SpoonerCentre of Cognitive and Neural Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JS, United Kingdom.
Irene Navarro LobatoDonders Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lisa GenzelDonders Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands L.Genzel@donders.ru.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9537-7959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New information is rarely learned in isolation; instead, most of what we experience can be incorporated into or uses previous knowledge networks in some form. Previous knowledge in form of a cognitive map can facilitate knowledge acquisition and will influence how we learn new spatial information. Here, we developed a new spatial navigation task where food locations are learned in a large, gangway maze to test how mice learn a large spatial map over a longer time period-the HexMaze. Analyzing performance across sessions as well as on specific trials, we can show simple memory effects as well as multiple effects of previous knowledge of the map accelerating both online learning and performance increases over offline periods when incorporating new information. We could identify the following three main phases: (1) learning the initial goal location; (2) faster learning after 2 weeks when learning a new goal location; and then (3) the ability to express one-session learning, leading to long-term memory effect after 12 weeks. Importantly, we are the first to show that buildup of a spatial map is dependent on how much time passes, not how often the animal is trained.

Indexed as

Spatial NavigationAnimalsMaze LearningMicecognitive mapmemory consolidationnavigationschemaspatial

Identifiers

PMID34135006
PMCPMC8362685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.