Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34134776›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science and biotechnology2021

Microalgal-based feed: promising alternative feedstocks for livestock and poultry production.

Imen Saadaoui, Rihab Rasheed, Ana Aguilar, Maroua Cherif, Hareb Al Jabri, Sami Sayadi, Schonna R Manning

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 197 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effects of dietaryVeterinary and animal science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Trends inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Digestibility and Nutritional Value of MicroalgaAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Imen SaadaouiCenter for Sustainable Development, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O.Box.2713, Doha, Qatar. imen.saadaoui@qu.edu.qa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9473-7067
Rihab RasheedCenter for Sustainable Development, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O.Box.2713, Doha, Qatar.
Ana AguilarDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, UTEX Culture Collection of Algae, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Maroua CherifCenter for Sustainable Development, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O.Box.2713, Doha, Qatar.
Hareb Al JabriCenter for Sustainable Development, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O.Box.2713, Doha, Qatar.
Sami SayadiCenter for Sustainable Development, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O.Box.2713, Doha, Qatar.
Schonna R ManningDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, UTEX Culture Collection of Algae, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Qatar University · QAThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

QNRF NPRP8-1087-1-207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an immediate need to identify alternative sources of high-nutrient feedstocks for domestic livestock production and poultry, not only to support growing food demands but also to produce microalgae-source functional foods with multiple health benefits. Various species of microalgae and cyanobacteria are used to supplement existing feedstocks. In this review, microalgae have been defined as a potential feedstock for domestic animals due to their abundance of proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, minerals, vitamins, and other high-value products. Additionally, the positive physiological effects on products of animals fed with microalgal biomass have been compiled and recommendations are listed to enhance the assimilation of biomolecules in ruminant and nonruminant animals, which possess differing digestive systems. Furthermore, the role of microalgae as prebiotics is also discussed. With regards to large scale cultivation of microalgae for use as feed, many economic trade-offs must be considered such as the selection of strains with desired nutritional properties, cultivation systems, and steps for downstream processing. These factors are highlighted with further investigations needed to reduce the overall costs of cultivation. Finally, this review outlines the pros and cons of utilizing microalgae as a supplementary feedstock for poultry and cattle, existing cultivation strategies, and the economics of large-scale microalgal production.

Indexed as

Functional feedHigh-value metaboliteLivestock productionMicroalgaePoultry product

Identifiers

PMID34134776
PMCPMC8359609
OpenAlexW3169381946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.