ArticleUrologia internationalis2022
Prospective Single-Center Study of SuperPulsed Thulium Fiber Laser in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Initial Clinical Data.
Article in Urologia internationalis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06721975 (Prospective Single-center Study Comparing Thulium Fiber Laser to Pulsed Thulium), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Single-center Study Comparing Thulium Fiber Laser to Pulsed Thulium:YAG Laser in the Ureteroscopic Treatment of Nephrolithiasis
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Complications of thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis by the EAU-YAU endourology and urolithiasis working group.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of Thulium Fiber Laser versus Holmium laser in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a Meta-analysis and systematic review.BMC urology · 2024Pooled it
- Advances in lasers for the minimally invasive treatment of upper and lower urinary tract conditions: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2023Pooled it
- Super pulsed thulium fiber laser outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC urology · 2023Pooled it
- Adoption of thulium fiber laser for lithotripsy A scoping review and bibliometric analysis.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Review
- Efficacy of thulium fiber laser litothripsy on large renal stones (> 1000 mm³) according to Hounsfield units: a prospective single-center study.BMC urology · 2026Article
- High-power holmium laser versus pulsed thulium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Results of a randomized prospective study.Central European journal of urology · 2026Article
- Expanding urolithiasis treatment: comparison of super pulsed thulium laser and holmium:YAG laser for ureteral stone management.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Prospective evaluation of efficacy, safety, cumulative laser energy, and stone-free rates in the post-market SOLTIVEUrolithiasis · 2025Article
- Long-term results of multimodal treatment of the prostate using the Thulium Laser.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2024Article
- Pulsed Thulium:YAG laser - What is the lithotripsy ablation efficiency for stone dust from human urinary stones? Results from an in vitro PEARLS study.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Do Hounsfield Units have any significance in predicting intra- and postoperative outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery using Holmium and Thulium fiber laser? Results from the FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR).World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: Is it living up to the hype?Asian journal of urology · 2023Review
- Does Moses technology improve the efficiency and outcomes of standard holmium laser lithotripsy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Central European journal of urology · 2022Review
- The clinical efficiency and safety of 60W superpulse thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe objective of this study was to present our clinical experience of using the thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).
methodsA prospective clinical study performed after the IRB approval (Sechenov University, Russia). Patients with stones <30 mm were treated with SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser (SP TFL) (NTO IRE-Polus, Russia) through a 200-μm-diameter fiber. Stone size, density, the duration of the operation, and laser on time (LOT) were measured. Based on the surgeon's feedback, retropulsion and intraoperative visibility were also assessed (Likert scale). Stone-free rates (SFRs) were assessed with a low-dose CT scan 90 days after the operation.
resultsBetween January 2018 and December 2019, 153 patients (mean age 54 ± 2.8 years) underwent RIRS with SP TFL (mean stone density 1,020 ± 382 HU). Median stone volume was 279.6 (139.4-615.8) mm3. Median LOT was 2.8 (IQR 1.6-6.6) min with median total energy for stone ablation 4.0 (IQR 2.1-7.17) kJ, median ablation speed was 1.7 (1.0-2.8) mm3/s, median ablation efficacy was 13.3 (7.3-20.9) J/mm3, and energy consumption was 170.3 (59.7-743.3) J/s. Overall, the SFR (at 3 months) was 89%. The overall complication rate was 8.4%. Retropulsion was present in 23 (15.1%) patients. Visibility was estimated as optimal in most patients, with poor visibility reported in only 13 (8.5%) patients.
conclusionThe SP TFL is a safe and efficient tool in lithotripsy, irrespective of the stone type and density. Retropulsion is minimal and visibility is maintained with SP TFL. Nonetheless, further clinical studies are needed to ensure optimal comparison with conventional holmium:YAG lithotripsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.