ArticleBJU international2022
Towards automatic recognition of pure and mixed stones using intra-operative endoscopic digital images.
Article in BJU international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in urolithiasis: a systematic review of utilization and effectiveness.World journal of urology · 2024Pooled it
- Study on automatic recognition of stone composition in intraoperative endoscopic images-a single center study.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Recognizing uric acid type of urinary stones by deep learning.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Clinical validation of an AI-assisted system for real-time kidney stone detection during flexible ureteroscopic surgery.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of 55,213 stones: understanding common morphological associations advances endoscopic stone recognition and AI integration.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Efficient urinary stone type prediction: a novel approach based on self-distillation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Investigation and quantification of composition variability in urinary stone analysis.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024Article
- Illumination matters part I: comparative analysis of light sources and illumination in flexible ureteroscopy-fundamental findings from a PEARLS analysis.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Illumination matters Part II: advanced comparative analysis of flexible ureteroscopes in a kidney model by PEARLS.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Advancements in stone classification: unveiling the beauty of urolithiasis.World journal of urology · 2024Review
- Predicting stone composition via machine-learning models trained on intra-operative endoscopic digital images.BMC urology · 2024Article
- Predicting Urinary Stone Composition in Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopic Images with a Convolutional Neural Network.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Prediction of the composition of urinary stones using deep learning.Investigative and clinical urology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess automatic computer-aided in situ recognition of the morphological features of pure and mixed urinary stones using intra-operative digital endoscopic images acquired in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this single-centre study, a urologist with 20 years' experience intra-operatively and prospectively examined the surface and section of all kidney stones encountered. Calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) or Ia, calcium oxalate dihydrate (COD) or IIb, and uric acid (UA) or IIIb morphological criteria were collected and classified to generate annotated datasets. A deep convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained to predict the composition of both pure and mixed stones. To explain the predictions of the deep neural network model, coarse localization heat-maps were plotted to pinpoint key areas identified by the network.
resultsThis study included 347 and 236 observations of stone surface and stone section, respectively; approximately 80% of all stones exhibited only one morphological type and approximately 20% displayed two. A highest sensitivity of 98% was obtained for the type 'pure IIIb/UA' using surface images. The most frequently encountered morphology was that of the type 'pure Ia/COM'; it was correctly predicted in 91% and 94% of cases using surface and section images, respectively. Of the mixed type 'Ia/COM + IIb/COD', Ia/COM was predicted in 84% of cases using surface images, IIb/COD in 70% of cases, and both in 65% of cases. With regard to mixed Ia/COM + IIIb/UA stones, Ia/COM was predicted in 91% of cases using section images, IIIb/UA in 69% of cases, and both in 74% of cases.
conclusionsThis preliminary study demonstrates that deep CNNs are a promising method by which to identify kidney stone composition from endoscopic images acquired intra-operatively. Both pure and mixed stone composition could be discriminated. Collected in a clinical setting, surface and section images analysed by a deep CNN provide valuable information about stone morphology for computer-aided diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.