Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34133724›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2021

United States Medicolegal Progress and Innovation in Telemedicine in the Age of COVID-19: A Primer for Neurosurgeons.

Michael J Cruz, Edwin Nieblas-Bedolla, Christopher C Young, Abdullah H Feroze, John R Williams, Richard G Ellenbogen, Michael R Levitt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J CruzSchool of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Edwin Nieblas-BedollaSchool of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Christopher C YoungDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abdullah H FerozeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
John R WilliamsDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Richard G EllenbogenDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Michael R LevittDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

MedtronicPhilips VolcanoStryker
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemedicine has received increased attention in recent years as a potential solution to expand clinical capability and patient access to care in many fields, including neurosurgery. Although patient and physician attitudes are rapidly shifting toward greater telemedicine use in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, there remains uncertainty about telemedicine's regulatory future. Despite growing evidence of telemedicine's utility, there remain a number of significant medicolegal barriers to its mass adoption and wider implementation. Herein, we examine recent progress in state and federal regulations in the United States governing telemedicine's implementation in quality of care, finance and billing, privacy and confidentiality, risk and liability, and geography and interstate licensure, with special attention to how these concern teleneurosurgical practice. We also review contemporary topics germane to the future of teleneurosurgery, including the continued expansion of reciprocity in interstate licensure, expanded coverage for homecare services for chronic conditions, expansion of Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursements, and protections of store-and-forward technologies. Additionally, we discuss recent successes in teleneurosurgery, stroke care, and rehabilitation as models for teleneurosurgical best practices. As telemedicine technology continues to mature and its expanse grows, neurosurgeons' familiarity with its benefits, limitations, and controversies will best allow for its successful adoption in our field to maximize patient care and outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineAgedHumansMedicareNeurosurgeonsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19InnovationMedicolegalTelemedicineTeleneurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID34133724
PMCPMC8344865
OpenAlexW3171482383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.