Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34133538›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2021

Antifungal susceptibility profile of Candida clinical isolates from 22 hospitals of São Paulo State, Brazil.

D K B Rodrigues, L X Bonfietti, R A Garcia, M R Araujo, J S Rodrigues, V M F Gimenes, M S C Melhem

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2026
    Article
  2. Candidemia in a tertiary hospital in Southern Brazil.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2026
    Article
  3. Resistance to Azoles inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. The multidrug-resistantCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Culturable yeast diversity in urban topsoil influenced by various anthropogenic impacts.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Candida parapsilosis complex in the clinical setting.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. TheMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Extracellular Vesicles fromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Pan-Echinocandin ResistantJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. First two fungemia cases caused byFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

L X BonfiettiNúcleo de Micologia do Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Secretaria de Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2554-1853
R A GarciaNúcleo de Micologia do Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Secretaria de Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2083-397X
M R AraujoNúcleo de Micologia do Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Secretaria de Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7928-6843
J S RodriguesNúcleo de Micologia do Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Secretaria de Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9634-426X
V M F GimenesLaboratório de Micologia Médica-LIM 53, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4616-126X
M S C MelhemNúcleo de Micologia do Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Secretaria de Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1335-8808
Instituto Adolfo Lutz · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of cryptic Candida species from candidemia cases in 22 public hospitals in São Paulo State, Brazil, and their antifungal susceptibility profiles. During 2017 and 2018, 144 isolates were molecularly identified as 14 species; C. parapsilosis (32.6%), C. albicans (27.7%), C. tropicalis (14.6%), C. glabrata (9.7%), C. krusei (2.8%), C. orthopsilosis (2.8%), C. haemulonii var. vulnera (2.1%), C. haemulonii (1.4%), C. metapsilosis (1.4%), C. dubliniensis (1.4%), C. guilliermondii (1.4%), C. duobushaemulonii (0.7%), C. kefyr (0.7%), and C. pelliculosa (0.7%). Poor susceptibility to fluconazole was identified in 6.4% of C. parapsilosis isolates (0.12 to >64 µg/mL), 50% of C. guilliermondii (64 µg/mL), 66.6% of C. haemulonii var. vulnera (16-32 µg/mL), and C. duobushaemulonii strain (MIC 64 µg/mL). Our results corroborated the emergence of C. glabrata in Brazilian cases of candidemia as previously reported. Importantly, we observed a large proportion of non-wild type C. glabrata isolates to voriconazole (28.6%; <0.015 to 4 µg/mL) all of which were also resistant to fluconazole (28.6%). Of note, C. haemulonii, a multidrug resistant species, has emerged in the Southeast region of Brazil. Our findings suggested a possible epidemiologic change in the region with an increase in fluconazole-resistant species causing candidemia. We stress the relevance of routine accurate identification to properly manage therapy and monitor epidemiologic trends.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaBrazilDrug Resistance, FungalHospitalsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID34133538
PMCPMC8208770
OpenAlexW3168494134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.