Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34133512›Full record

ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2021

Electroencephalographic findings among inpatients with COVID-19 in a tertiary hospital from a middle-income country.

Luíza Alves Corazza, João Fellipe Santos Tatsch, Maraysa Pereira Barros, Apolônio Peixoto de Queiroz, Luana Lôbo Ribeiro Batista, Mariana Barbosa Aidar, Meire Argentoni Baldocchi, Maria Sheila Guimarães Rocha, Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. The value of EEG attenuation in the prediction of outcome in COVID-19 patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luíza Alves CorazzaHospital Santa Marcelina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7866-7786
João Fellipe Santos TatschHospital Santa Marcelina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6807-5004
Maraysa Pereira BarrosHospital Santa Marcelina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2952-9237
Apolônio Peixoto de QueirozHospital Santa Marcelina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5598-7389
Luana Lôbo Ribeiro BatistaHospital Santa Marcelina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2378-6424
Mariana Barbosa AidarHospital Santa Marcelina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5073-4588
Meire Argentoni BaldocchiHospital Santa Marcelina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2125-9455
Maria Sheila Guimarães RochaHospital Santa Marcelina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4312-3994
Sonia Maria Dozzi BruckiHospital Santa Marcelina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8303-6732
Hospital Santa Marcelina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2019, the world witnessed the emergence of a new type of coronavirus - the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The spectrum of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is variable, and amongst its manifestations are neurological implications.

objectiveThis report aimed to describe electroencephalographic findings in COVID-19 patients from a general tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.

methodsIt was a retrospective, observational, and non-interventional study. Data were collected anonymously, comprising inpatients from Mar 1 to Jun 30, 2020, either confirmed (positive RT-PCR) or probable cases (CO-RADS 4/5) who had performed EEG during hospitalization.

resultsTwenty-eight patients were enrolled, 17 (60.7%) women and 11 men, with a median age of 58 (minimum and maximum: 18-86; IQR 23.5). COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed in 22 (78.5%). Twenty-one patients (75%) had severe disease, requiring mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); 16 (57.1%) patients developed adjunct sepsis throughout hospitalization. There was no specific pattern found for COVID-19 in EEG. No patients presented with status epilepticus or electrographic events; most patients developed an encephalopathic pattern, as seen in most studies, with a high prevalence of altered mental status as an indication for EEG. Adjunct sepsis was associated with higher mortality.

conclusionsEEG presents as a useful tool in the context of COVID-19, as in other conditions, to differentiate nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) from encephalopathy and other causes of mental status alterations. Further studies are required to analyze whether there might be a specific EEG pattern to the disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19InpatientsBrazilCOVID-19 TestingElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Tertiary Care Centers

Identifiers

PMID34133512
PMCPMC9231444
OpenAlexW3167886839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.