Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34133246›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2021

Objective pain stimulation intensity and pain sensation assessment using machine learning classification and regression based on electrodermal activity.

Hugo F Posada-Quintero, Youngsun Kong, Ki H Chon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06701461 (Measurement of Osteoarthritic Patient Pain Through Electrodermal Activity Signals), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06701461 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Measurement of Osteoarthritic Patient Pain Through Electrodermal Activity Signals

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2026 to 2026Enrolled15ConditionsOsteo Arthritis KneeArmsElectrodermal Activity signal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sympathetic Arousal Detection in Horses Using Electrodermal Activity.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hugo F Posada-QuinteroDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0003-4514-4772
Youngsun KongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-5409-3888
Ki H ChonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

Quantitative Assessment of Dental Pain using a smartphone-attachable electrodermal activity sensorR21DE029563 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI CHEN, I-PING, CHON, KI H · 2020 to 2021
$463k
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R21 DE029563-01NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE029563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An objective measure of pain remains an unmet need of people with chronic pain, estimated to be 1/3 of the adult population in the United States. The current gold standard to quantify pain is highly subjective, based upon self-reporting with numerical or visual analog scale (VAS). This subjectivity complicates pain management and exacerbates the epidemic of opioid abuse. We have tested classification and regression machine learning models to objectively estimate pain sensation in healthy subjects using electrodermal activity (EDA). Twenty-three volunteers underwent pain stimulation using thermal grills. Three different "pain stimulation intensities" were induced for each subject, who reported the "pain sensation" right after each stimulus using a VAS (0-10). EDA data were collected throughout the experiment. For machine learning, we computed validated features of EDA based on time-domain decomposition, spectral analysis, and differential features. Models for estimation of pain stimulation intensity and pain sensation achieved maximum macroaveraged geometric mean scores of 69.7% and 69.2%, respectively, when three classes were considered ("No," "Low," and "High"). Regression of levels of stimulation intensity and pain sensation achieved

Indexed as

ElectrodiagnosisMachine LearningPain MeasurementPain PerceptionPain ThresholdSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHot TemperatureHumansMalePainPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Resultselectrodermal activitypainpain sensationpain stimulation intensitythermal grill

Identifiers

PMID34133246
PMCPMC8409909
OpenAlexW3166634343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.