Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34133037›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society2021

Scar quality in children with burns 5-7 years after injury: A cross-sectional multicentre study.

Inge Spronk, Anniek Stortelers, Cornelis H van der Vlies, Paul P M van Zuijlen, Anouk Pijpe, Burden of Burn Injuries Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Single Institution's Recent Experience With Pediatric Hand Burns.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Scar quality in children with burns 5-7 years after injury: A cross-sectional multicentre study.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2021
    Article
  10. The Course of Scar Formation and Predictors of Scar Quality in 490 Paediatric Burn Patients During the First Year Post-Burn.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Inge SpronkAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9571-576X
Anniek StortelersBurn Centre, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, Netherlands.
Cornelis H van der VliesBurn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Paul P M van ZuijlenBurn Centre, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, Netherlands.
Anouk PijpeBurn Centre, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, Netherlands.
Burden of Burn Injuries Study Group
Erasmus MC · NLRed Cross Hospital · GRApple (Israel) · ILEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term scar formation is an important adverse consequence in children with burns, however, information regarding scar quality in the long-term is lacking. Therefore, we evaluated scar quality and its predictors in children with burns 5-7 years after injury. Parents of children with mild/intermediate burns (≤10% total body surface area burned), and of children with severe burns (>10% burned) completed the patient scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS 2.0) for their children's-in their opinion-worst scar 5-7 years post-burn. Outcomes and predictive factors of scar quality were studied, and, for children with severe burns, POSAS parent scores were compared with observer scores. We included 103 children with mild/intermediate burns and 28 with severe burns (response rate: 51%). Most children (87%) had scars that differed from normal skin, with most differences reported for colour, and least for pain. Except for colour, children with severe burns had significantly higher scores (difference 0-2 points) on all scar characteristics (representing poorer scar quality) compared with children with mild/intermediate burns. Parent POSAS scores were on average 2.0-2.6 points higher compared to observer scores. Number of surgeries predicted both the mean POSAS and the mean overall opinion of a scar. In conclusion, 5-7 years post-burn, the scar of the majority of children differed from normal skin, especially on the characteristic colour. The uncovered insights are useful in counselling of children and their parents on expectations of the final outcome of their (children's) scar(s), and help in further targeting scar prevention strategies for the individual child.

Indexed as

CicatrixWound HealingBody Surface AreaChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPainburn injurieschildrenlong-term outcomesscar quality

Identifiers

PMID34133037
PMCPMC8596883
OpenAlexW3167002543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.