Trial reportEating and weight disorders : EWD2022
Development and initial validation of an underreporting of Disordered Eating Behaviors Scale.
Trial report in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining the Factor Structure and Subgroup Invariance of the Deliberate Denial of Disordered Eating Behaviors Scale.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Medical residents and eating disorders: an investigation of prevalence and correlates in hospital settings in Damascus.BioPsychoSocial medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop the Underreporting of Disordered Eating Behaviors Scale (UDEBS) to detect attempts by respondents to underreport eating patterns that reflect symptoms of an eating disorder. In "Study 1", the scale and validity measures were administered via an online survey to 692 undergraduates. In "Study 2", these measures were administered to 810 undergraduates using a simulation design where participants were randomized to four conditions: (1) answering as truthfully as possible, or as if they are trying to hide (2) Binge Eating Disorder (BED), (3) Anorexia Nervosa (AN), or (4) Bulimia Nervosa (BN). "Study 1" results suggested that men and women have divergent UDEBS distributions and item endorsement rates; therefore, separate analyses were performed by gender. Individuals who scored above one standard deviation (SD) on the UDEBS reported less body dissatisfaction and disordered eating (ps < 0.05) than those who scored one SD below. In "Study 2" women who were instructed to hide an eating disorder reported significantly higher UDEBS scores than women instructed to answer truthfully. There were no significant differences between conditions for men. The final 15-item scale indicated that women who complied with instructions to underreport produced scores 1.45 (BN) to 1.72 (AN) times greater than the truthful responding condition. This novel scale can potentially assist in detecting women who underreport in relation to disordered eating, which may be useful in research and clinical contexts where underreporting is a concern. Future research is needed with men and clinical samples.Level I Evidence obtained from an experimental study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.