ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2021
Detecting ALK Rearrangement with RT-PCR: A Reliable Approach Compared with Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with NSCLC.
Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current status and challenges of immunotherapy in ALK rearranged NSCLC.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- ALK rearrangements and resistance mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Review
- Actionable driver gene alterations in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a review.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Review
- A New Approach of DetectingCancers · 2024Article
- A Highly Sensitive XNA-Based RT-qPCR Assay for the Identification of ALK, RET, and ROS1 Fusions in Lung Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Unraveling the Potential of ALK-Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comprehensive Insights and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Plasma-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling DNA Assays for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2024Article
- A narrative review of methods for the identification ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2023Review
- Article
- Advances in the Biology, Detection Techniques, and Clinical Applications of Circulating Tumor Cells.Journal of oncology · 2022Review
- Targeted RNA-sequencing analysis for fusion transcripts detection in tumor diagnostics: assessment of bioinformatic tools reliability in FFPE samples.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecise detection of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement guides the application of ALK-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely used in clinics, but DNA-based NGS used to detect fusion genes has delivered false-negative results. However, fusion genes can be successfully detected at the transcription level and with higher sensitivity using RNA-based reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
objectiveThis study compared the performance of RT-PCR and NGS in the detection of echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK fusion in Chinese patients with NSCLC.
methodsFormalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from 153 patients who were pathologically diagnosed as having NSCLC were collected from November 2017 to October 2019. Both DNA/RNA-based NGS and RNA-based RT-PCR were used to detect EML4-ALK fusion. For samples with discordant ALK status results, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or Sanger sequencing was used to further confirm the ALK status.
resultsIn total, 124 samples were successfully analyzed using both NGS and RT-PCR. For 118 samples, results were consistent between NGS and RT-PCR, with 25 reported as ALK fusion positive and 93 as ALK fusion negative, achieving a concordance rate of 95.16%. Among the six samples with disconcordant results, five were positive using RT-PCR but negative using NGS, and one was positive using NGS but negative using RT-PCR. Four of six cases with disconcordant results (three RT-PCR positive and one NGS positive) were successfully validated using either FISH or Sanger sequencing.
conclusionsCompared with NGS, RT-PCR appears to be a reliable method of detecting EML4-ALK fusion in patients with NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.