Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34132984›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2022

Interventions to address disparities and barriers to pediatric cancer survivorship care: a scoping review.

Erin M Mobley, Diana J Moke, Joel Milam, Carol Y Ochoa, Julia Stal, Nosa Osazuwa, Jai Kemp, Maria Bolshakova, Jennifer Dinalo, Aneesa Motala and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Subsequent malignant neoplasm among cancer survivors in the United States.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Myths and Presumptions About Cancer Survivorship.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Rural, Large Town, and Urban Differences in Optimal Subspecialty Follow-up and Survivorship Care Plan Documentation among Childhood Cancer Survivors.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Erin M MobleyDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA. Erin.Mobley@jax.ufl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6278-6593
Diana J MokeDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Joel MilamDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, CA, Irvine, Irvine, USA.
Carol Y OchoaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, CA, Los Angeles, USA.
Julia StalDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, CA, Los Angeles, USA.
Nosa OsazuwaSouthern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, CA, Los Angeles, USA.
Jai KempSouthern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, CA, Los Angeles, USA.
Maria BolshakovaSouthern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, CA, Los Angeles, USA.
Jennifer DinaloSouthern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, CA, Los Angeles, USA.
Aneesa MotalaSouthern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, CA, Los Angeles, USA.
Susanne HempelSouthern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, CA, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

Training grant for Cancer Control and EpidemiologyT32CA009492 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI PENTZ, MARY ANN · 1985 to 2019
$7.4M
The Role of dyadic factors on psychosocial wellbeing and healthcare interactions among childhood cancer survivors, parents, and medical providers: A mixed method approachF99CA264294 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI OCHOA-DOMINGUEZ, CAROL · 2021 to 2021
$39k
AHRQ HHS Contract No. 75Q80120D00009/Task Order 75Q80120F32001NCI NIH HHS 5T32CA009492-35NCI NIH HHS F99 CA264294NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany childhood cancer survivors experience disparities due to barriers to recommended survivorship care. With an aim to demonstrate evidence-based approaches to alleviate barriers and decrease disparities, we conducted a scoping review of (1) proposed strategies and (2) evaluated interventions for improving pediatric cancer survivorship care.

methodsWe searched research databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO), research registries, and grey literature (websites of professional organizations and guideline clearing houses) for guidelines and published studies available through October 2020 (scoping review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/D8Q7Y ).

resultsWe identified 16 proposed strategies to address disparities and barriers endorsed by professional organizations including clinical practice guidelines (N=9), policy statements (N=4), and recommendations (N=3). Twenty-seven published studies evaluated an intervention to alleviate disparities or barriers to survivorship care; however, these evaluated interventions were not well aligned with the proposed strategies endorsed by professional organizations. Most commonly, interventions evaluated survivorship care plans (N=11) or models of care (N=11) followed by individual survivorship care services (N=9). Interventions predominantly targeted patients rather than providers or systems and used technology, education, shared care, collaboration, and location-based interventions.

conclusionsPublished studies aimed at overcoming disparities and barriers to survivorship care for childhood cancer survivors revealed that gaps remain between published recommendations and empirical evaluations of interventions aiming to reduce barriers and disparities. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Additional research is needed to identify evidence-based interventions to improve survivorship care for childhood cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsChildHumansSurvivorshipCancer survivorsHealthcare disparitiesHealth equityHealth services accessibility

Identifiers

PMID34132984
PMCPMC8674368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.