ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2022
High-density mapping with fragmentation analysis in patients with reentrant atrial tachycardias (MAP-FLURHY study).
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeReentrant atrial tachycardias (ATs) use areas of slow conduction that can be visualized as fragmented electrograms. We aimed to test an ablation strategy based on the identification and ablation of spots with fragmented electrograms in reentrant ATs, using Rhythmia navigation system.
methodsAll consecutive patients from June 2016 to June 2019 were included. The IntellaMap ORION Catheter was used to detect sites with fragmentation, arbitrarily defined as fragmented electrograms > 70 ms. Entrainment was used to check if these areas belonged to the AT circuit. Ablation targeted the longest fragmented electrogram within the circuit: focal ablation for microreentries and lines for macroreentries. Ablation success was defined from each AT as conversion to sinus rhythm or another AT.
resultsTwenty-seven consecutive patients with 44 mappable ATs were included. All ATs showed sites with fragmented electrograms (104 sites; 2.4 sites per AT); 43/44 ATs had fragmented electrograms within the circuit, which were the target of ablation. Ablation success: 34/36 ATs (94%); success could not be assessed in 8 circuits, in 6 due to mechanical conversion to sinus rhythm at the target fragmented site. Fragmented electrograms within the AT circuits were longer than electrograms outside the circuits (110 ± 30 vs 90 ± 15 ms, p < 0.001). A fragmentation duration > 100 ms/ > 40% of the AT cycle length predicted to be a successful site for ablation with 72.3%/73.8% specificity, respectively. Sixty-two percent of the patients were free from atrial arrhythmias at 1 year.
conclusionsMost ATs had detectable fragmented electrograms within the circuit, which could be the target of ablation with high efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.