Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34132900›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Use of medical chaperones by colon and rectal surgeons in outpatient practice.

Fiona J Dore, Susanna S Hill, Paul R Sturrock, Justin A Maykel, Karim Alavi, Jennifer S Davids

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fiona J DoreDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Susanna S HillDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Paul R SturrockDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Justin A MaykelDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Karim AlaviDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Jennifer S DavidsDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA. Jennifer.davids@umassmemorial.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8800-1822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study is to determine the frequency and motivations for medical chaperone use during anorectal exams by colon and rectal surgeons in the outpatient setting. STUDY

designThis cross-sectional study examined factors impacting chaperone use via an anonymous online survey distributed via the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons email list. Routine chaperone use was defined as ≥ 90%.

resultsOf 1,380 emailed board-certified colon and rectal surgeons, 402 (29.1%) completed the survey in November 2019. Median years in practice was 14, and 72.3% were male. Overall, 65.2% reported routine use of chaperones during anorectal exams. Over half (56.3%) felt chaperones should be mandatory and were more likely to report routine use than those who did not (85.7 vs. 39.1%; p < 0.001). Only 23.7% reported that their institutions had formal chaperone policies. The most common reason for use was medicolegal (91.8%), and the most common barrier was chaperone availability (56.7%). When chaperones were used, 42% did not document use in the medical record. On multivariable analysis, increased odds of routine chaperone use were independently associated with: being ≤ 10 years in practice, routine chaperone use during fellowship, and chaperones being routinely available.

conclusionHalf of surgeons felt that chaperones should be mandatory, suggesting lack of consensus among the cohort. Despite expressing legal concerns, one-third did not use chaperones and nearly half who used chaperones did not document their use. Efforts to improve chaperone availability, documentation of chaperone use, and knowledge of policies are necessary.

Indexed as

Medical ChaperonesSurgeonsColonCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleOutpatientsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAnorectal examColon and rectal surgeonColorectal surgeryMedical chaperoneOffice exam

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.