ArticleEuropean radiology2022
A clinicopathological study of lung adenocarcinomas with pure ground-glass opacity > 3 cm on high-resolution computed tomography.
Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of T stage classification strategy for >2 cm ground-glass opacity non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Quantitative analysis of imaging characteristics in lung adenocarcinoma in situ using artificial intelligence.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Histopathologic fate of resected pulmonary pure ground glass nodule: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Distinct impacts of radiological appearance on lymph node metastasis and prognosis based on solid size in clinical T1 non-small cell lung cancer.Respiratory research · 2024Article
- The predictive value of computed tomography value on high-resolution images in differentiating invasive from indolent lung adenocarcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Preoperative prognostic prediction for stage I lung adenocarcinomas: Impact of the computed tomography features associated with the new histological grading system.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to discuss whether a diameter of 3 cm is a threshold for diagnosing lung adenocarcinomas presenting with radiological pure ground-glass mass (PGGM, pure ground-glass opacity > 3 cm) as adenocarcinomas in situ or minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (AIS-MIAs). Another aim was to identify CT features and patient prognosis that differentiate AIS-MIAs from invasive adenocarcinomas (IACs) in patients with PGGMs.
methodsFrom June 2007 to October 2015, 69 resected PGGMs with HRCT and followed up for ≥ 5 years were included in this study and divided into AIS-MIA (n = 13) and IAC (n = 56) groups. Firth's logistic regression model was performed to determine CT characteristics that helped distinguish IACs from AIS-MIAs. The discriminatory power of the significant predictors was tested with the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Disease recurrence was also evaluated.
resultsUnivariable and multivariable analyses identified that the mean CT attenuation (odds ratio: 1.054, p = 0.0087) was the sole significant predictor for preoperatively discriminating IACs from AIS-MIAs in patients with PGGMs. The CT attenuation had an excellent differentiating accuracy (AUC: 0.981), with the optimal cut-off value at -600 HU (sensitivity: 87.5%; specificity: 100%). Additionally, no recurrence was observed in patients manifesting with PGGMs > 3 cm, and the 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were both 100%, even in cases of IAC.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that PGGMs > 3 cm could still be AIS-MIAs. When PGGMs are encountered in clinical practice, the CT value may be the only valuable parameter to preoperatively distinguish IACs from AIS-MIAs. KEY POINTS: • Patients with pure ground-glass opacity > 3 cm in diameter are rare but can be diagnosed as adenocarcinomas in situ or minimally invasive adenocarcinomas. • The mean CT attenuation is the sole significant CT parameter that differentiates invasive adenocarcinoma from adenocarcinoma in situ or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma in patients with pure ground-glass opacity > 3 cm. • Lung adenocarcinoma with pure ground-glass opacity > 3 cm has an excellent prognosis, even in cases of invasive adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.