Observational studyDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2022
[Results of the Limberg flap procedure in acute and chronic pilonidal abscesses].
Observational study in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic treatment versus open excision for pediatric pilonidal disease: technical description of a modified (P)EPSiT approach using standard equipment and retrospective cohort study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- [Effectiveness of fascial tissue flaps and skin flaps with layered sutures for repair of wounds after excision of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA number of different treatment algorithms are recommended for the treatment of an acute pilonidal abscess and a chronic pilonidal sinus. While a 1-stage surgical procedure using excision or plastic reconstruction according to Limberg or Karydakis is suggested for chronic pilonidal sinus, a 2‑stage procedure is recommended for an acute pilonidal abscess. The aim of this study was to compare the results of the 1‑stage surgery with plastic reconstruction according to Limberg for acute pilonidal abscess and chronic pilonidal sinus in terms of recurrence, disorders of wound healing, inpatient length of stay and patient satisfaction.
methodsFrom 2009 to 2014 a total of 39 patients were included in this prospective observational study: 21 patients with acute pilonidal abscess and 18 patients with chronic pilonidal sinus. All patients were surgically treated with a 1‑stage procedure using the Limberg flap method. The groups were compared in terms of postoperative complication rates and frequency of recurrence.
resultsBoth groups were basically comparable with respect to demographic characteristics and risk factor profiles. Analysis of the postoperative results showed a comparable rate of postoperative wound healing disorders (10% vs. 17%, p = 0.647). In the group with acute pilonidal abscesses there was no recurrence during the observational period, while in the chronic pilonidal sinus group there were 2 (11%) recurrences (p = 0.206).
conclusionThe results of the Limberg flap procedure regarding acute pilonidal abscesses were comparable to those of chronic pilonidal sinus. The results of this study show a trend to a lower risk of recurrence. The use of the Limberg flaps therefore also seems to be an adequate treatment option in an acute infection situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.