ArticleJAMA network open2021
Analysis of Survival Among Adults With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in the National Cancer Database.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparison of overall survival from early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer stratified by TNM stage: a systematic review.British journal of cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Rectal prolapse as an initial presentation of colorectal cancer: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- The histological and molecular characteristics of early-onset colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- The Association between Early-Onset Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Patients Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.F1000Research · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical Delays and Comparative Outcomes in Younger and Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Pooled it
- Closing the Diagnostic Gap in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Red-Flag Symptoms, Screening, and Inherited Risk.Cancers · 2026Review
- Mutations in Exon 29 of Ring Finger Protein 213 Are Associated with Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Stage-dependent prognostic impact of age in colorectal cancer: A population-based SEER analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Association of Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index With Survival Following Upfront Laryngectomy for Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics and stage-adjusted outcomes of sporadic pMMR/MSS early-onset colorectal cancer.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program in a cancer center.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- National Trends in Rectal Cancer Among Younger Patients: A National Cancer Database Analysis.Cureus · 2026Article
- Determinants of self-management among gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a structural equation modeling analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- A Clinicopathologic, Molecular, and Prognostic Comparison Between Early- and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Korea: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effect of Race and Tumor Subsite on Survival Outcome in Early- and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of early-onset colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- One-year survival rate and factors associated with stage IV colorectal cancer at National General Hospital in Indonesia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Treatment Delays and Survival Divides: Race, Sex, and Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Disparities.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Review
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: While increased adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines in the US has been associated with significant reductions in cancer incidence in US individuals aged 50 years and older, the incidence of CRC among those aged younger than 50 years has been steadily increasing. Understanding the survival among individuals with early-onset CRC compared with those aged 50 years and older is fundamental to informing treatment approaches and understanding the unique biological distinctiveness within early-onset CRC. Objective: To characterize the overall survival for individuals with early-onset CRC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database. Included individuals were ages 0 to 90 years and diagnosed with primary CRC from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2015. Individuals diagnosed at ages 51 through 55 years were selected as the reference group and defined as later-onset CRC for this study. Individuals diagnosed at age 50 years were excluded to minimize an apparent screening detection bias at that age in our population, given that these individuals disproportionately presented with earlier stage. All statistical analyses were conducted from January 4, 2020, through December 26, 2020. Exposures: Early-onset CRC was defined as age younger than 50 years at diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Among 769 871 individuals with CRC (377 890 [49.1%] women; 636 791 White individuals [82.7%]), 353 989 individuals (46.0%) died (median [range] follow-up: 2.9 [0-14.0] years), 102 168 individuals (13.3%) had early-onset CRC, and 78 812 individuals (10.2%) had later-onset CRC. Individuals with early-onset CRC, compared with those diagnosed with CRC at ages 51 through 55 years, had a lower 10-year survival rate (53.6% [95% CI, 53.2%-54.0%] vs 54.3% [95% CI, 53.8%-54.8%]; P < .001) in unadjusted analysis. However, after adjustment for other factors associated with mortality, most notably stage, individuals with early-onset CRC had a lower risk of death compared with individuals diagnosed from ages 51 through 55 years (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93-0.96]; P < .001). In the model adjusted for stage, the HR for individuals with early-onset CRC was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.88-0.90; P < .001). The survival advantage was greatest for individuals diagnosed at ages 35 through 39 years (adjusted HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.92]; P < .001) and stages I (adjusted HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81-0.93]; P < .001) and II (adjusted HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82-0.90]; P < .001) and was absent among those diagnosed at ages 25 years or younger and stages III through IV. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that there is a survival benefit for individuals with early-onset CRC compared with those diagnosed with CRC at later ages. Further study is needed to understand the underlying heterogeneity of survival among individuals with early-onset CRC by age and stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.