Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34132794›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Analysis of Survival Among Adults With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in the National Cancer Database.

En Cheng, Holly N Blackburn, Kimmie Ng, Donna Spiegelman, Melinda L Irwin, Xiaomei Ma, Cary P Gross, Fred K Tabung, Edward L Giovannucci, Pamela L Kunz and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Determinants of self-management among gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a structural equation modeling analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Advanced biomedical research · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

En ChengDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Holly N BlackburnDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Kimmie NgDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Donna SpiegelmanYale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Melinda L IrwinDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Xiaomei MaDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Cary P GrossDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Fred K TabungDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.
Edward L GiovannucciDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pamela L KunzYale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Xavier LlorYale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Kevin BillingsleyDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jeffrey A MeyerhardtDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nita AhujaDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Charles S FuchsDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Smilow Cancer Hospital · USYale Cancer Center · USYale University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: While increased adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines in the US has been associated with significant reductions in cancer incidence in US individuals aged 50 years and older, the incidence of CRC among those aged younger than 50 years has been steadily increasing. Understanding the survival among individuals with early-onset CRC compared with those aged 50 years and older is fundamental to informing treatment approaches and understanding the unique biological distinctiveness within early-onset CRC. Objective: To characterize the overall survival for individuals with early-onset CRC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database. Included individuals were ages 0 to 90 years and diagnosed with primary CRC from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2015. Individuals diagnosed at ages 51 through 55 years were selected as the reference group and defined as later-onset CRC for this study. Individuals diagnosed at age 50 years were excluded to minimize an apparent screening detection bias at that age in our population, given that these individuals disproportionately presented with earlier stage. All statistical analyses were conducted from January 4, 2020, through December 26, 2020. Exposures: Early-onset CRC was defined as age younger than 50 years at diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Among 769 871 individuals with CRC (377 890 [49.1%] women; 636 791 White individuals [82.7%]), 353 989 individuals (46.0%) died (median [range] follow-up: 2.9 [0-14.0] years), 102 168 individuals (13.3%) had early-onset CRC, and 78 812 individuals (10.2%) had later-onset CRC. Individuals with early-onset CRC, compared with those diagnosed with CRC at ages 51 through 55 years, had a lower 10-year survival rate (53.6% [95% CI, 53.2%-54.0%] vs 54.3% [95% CI, 53.8%-54.8%]; P < .001) in unadjusted analysis. However, after adjustment for other factors associated with mortality, most notably stage, individuals with early-onset CRC had a lower risk of death compared with individuals diagnosed from ages 51 through 55 years (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93-0.96]; P < .001). In the model adjusted for stage, the HR for individuals with early-onset CRC was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.88-0.90; P < .001). The survival advantage was greatest for individuals diagnosed at ages 35 through 39 years (adjusted HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.92]; P < .001) and stages I (adjusted HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81-0.93]; P < .001) and II (adjusted HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82-0.90]; P < .001) and was absent among those diagnosed at ages 25 years or younger and stages III through IV. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that there is a survival benefit for individuals with early-onset CRC compared with those diagnosed with CRC at later ages. Further study is needed to understand the underlying heterogeneity of survival among individuals with early-onset CRC by age and stage.

Indexed as

Age of OnsetSurvival RateAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidence

Identifiers

PMID34132794
PMCPMC8209612
OpenAlexW3171982615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.