Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34132447›Full record

Observational studyGeriatrics & gerontology international2021

Measuring positive caregiving experiences in family caregivers of nursing home residents: A comparison of the Positive Experiences Scale, Gain in Alzheimer Care INstrument, and Positive Aspects of Caregiving questionnaire.

Hanneke Ja Smaling, Karlijn J Joling, Wilco P Achterberg, Anneke L Francke, Jenny T van der Steen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Namaste Care Family for people with dementia and family-A randomized controlled trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. The Cost of Compassion: Caregiver Fatigue Associated with Caring for Persons with Disability in a Rural Population in India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanneke Ja SmalingDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7836-431X
Karlijn J JolingDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Wilco P AchterbergDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Anneke L FranckeDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jenny T van der SteenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

Fonds NutsOhra 1405-181University Network of the Care sector South HollandZonMw 733050302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare the Positive Experiences Scale (PES), Gain in Alzheimer Care INstrument (GAIN) and Positive Aspects of Caregiving (PAC) in assessing positive caregiving experiences among caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia, and to explore which caregiver and care recipient characteristics relate to positive caregiving experiences.

methodsA total of 63 caregivers (mean age 59.2 years; SD 11.8) of nursing home residents with dementia from four Dutch nursing homes participated in this cross-sectional observational study. Internal consistency, convergent validity and user-friendliness (i.e. perception of item relevance and comprehensibility, ease of use, missing items, and user preference) were examined using Cronbach's alpha's, correlation coefficients and descriptive statistics, respectively.

resultsThe Cronbach's alpha for the GAIN, PAC and PES was 0.90, 0.94 and 0.68, respectively. The sum score of the PES showed a ceiling effect. Convergent validity was confirmed for all three instruments. The PES had the least missing data (mean number of missing items 0.2, SD 0.5) and was preferred by 40% of the caregivers, followed by the GAIN (mean number of missing items 0.6, SD 1.7, preferred by 11%). Positive caregiving experiences were negatively associated with educational level (range -0.28 to -0.35). Only the PES correlated positively with caregiver age (r = 0.25).

conclusionsAll three questionnaires can be used to assess positive caregiving experiences, but the GAIN might be the most suitable questionnaire for caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia. Further research is necessary to examine generalizability of the findings. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 636-643.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyHumansNursing HomesSurveys and Questionnairescaregiversdementiainternal consistencynursing homespositive caregiving experiences

Identifiers

PMID34132447
PMCPMC8453581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.