Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34132437›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2021

A comprehensive score reflecting memory-related fMRI activations and deactivations as potential biomarker for neurocognitive aging.

Joram Soch, Anni Richter, Hartmut Schütze, Jasmin M Kizilirmak, Anne Assmann, Gusalija Behnisch, Hannah Feldhoff, Larissa Fischer, Julius Heil, Lea Knopf and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Precuneus Activity during Retrieval Is Positively Associated with Amyloid Burden in Cognitively Normal OlderThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Joram SochGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8879-5666
Anni RichterLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9681-6298
Hartmut SchützeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jasmin M KizilirmakGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5938-3523
Anne AssmannGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany.
Gusalija BehnischLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Hannah FeldhoffLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Larissa FischerLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Julius HeilLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Lea KnopfLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Christian MerkelLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8730-5653
Matthias RaschickLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Clara-Johanna SchietkeLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Annika SchultLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Constanze I SeidenbecherLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Renat YakupovGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany.
Gabriel ZieglerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jens WiltfangGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Göttingen, Germany.
Emrah DüzelGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany.
Björn Hendrik SchottGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8237-4481

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults and particularly those at risk for developing dementia typically show a decline in episodic memory performance, which has been associated with altered memory network activity detectable via functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). To quantify the degree of these alterations, a score has been developed as a putative imaging biomarker for successful aging in memory for older adults (Functional Activity Deviations during Encoding, FADE; Düzel et al., Hippocampus, 2011; 21: 803-814). Here, we introduce and validate a more comprehensive version of the FADE score, termed FADE-SAME (Similarity of Activations during Memory Encoding), which differs from the original FADE score by considering not only activations but also deactivations in fMRI contrasts of stimulus novelty and successful encoding, and by taking into account the variance of young adults' activations. We computed both scores for novelty and subsequent memory contrasts in a cohort of 217 healthy adults, including 106 young and 111 older participants, as well as a replication cohort of 117 young subjects. We further tested the stability and generalizability of both scores by controlling for different MR scanners and gender, as well as by using different data sets of young adults as reference samples. Both scores showed robust age-group-related differences for the subsequent memory contrast, and the FADE-SAME score additionally exhibited age-group-related differences for the novelty contrast. Furthermore, both scores correlate with behavioral measures of cognitive aging, namely memory performance. Taken together, our results suggest that single-value scores of memory-related fMRI responses may constitute promising biomarkers for quantifying neurocognitive aging.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBrainCognitive AgingFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultcognitive agingepisodic memoryfMRIhippocampusmemory impairmentsubsequent memory effect

Identifiers

PMID34132437
PMCPMC8410542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.