Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34132067›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2021

Association of menopause, aging and treatment procedures with positive margins after therapeutic cervical conization for CIN 3: a retrospective study of 8,856 patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Masae Ikeda, Mikio Mikami, Miwa Yasaka, Takayuki Enomoto, Yoichi Kobayashi, Satoru Nagase, Masatoshi Yokoyama, Hidetaka Katabuchi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Masae IkedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan. ikedam@tokai-u.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-7289-4379
Mikio MikamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7496-3518
Miwa YasakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1608-9121
Takayuki EnomotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4538-5541
Yoichi KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-0625
Satoru NagaseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5212-1128
Masatoshi YokoyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saga University Faculty of Medicine, Saga, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6361-4734
Hidetaka KatabuchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kumamoto University Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2403-6134
Tokai University · JPKumamoto University · JPKyorin University · JPNiigata University · JPSaga University · JPYamagata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology conducted a retrospective multi-institutional survey of patients who underwent cervical conization in Japan. This study aimed to determine the predictive factors for positive surgical margins in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) patients after therapeutic cervical conization and those for positive margins in patients who did not experience recurrence and did not undergo additional treatment.

methodsIn 2009 and 2013, 14,832 patients underwent cervical conization at 205 institutions in Japan. Of these, 8856 patients who underwent therapeutic conization fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Their histologic findings and clinical outcomes were evaluated based on standard statistical procedures and clinical and demographic characteristics.

resultsNegative and positive margins were observed in 7,585 and 1,271 (14.4%) patients, respectively. The predictors of positive margins were menopausal status (p<0.001), loop electrosurgical excision procedure (p<0.001), and Shimodaira-Taniguchi (S-T) conization (p<0.001). Of 1,271 patients with positive margins, 1,060 underwent no additional treatment; among those 1,060 patients, 129 (12.2%) experienced recurrence. The predictors of positive margins in patients who did not undergo additional treatment and did not experience recurrence were age, parity, gravidity, S-T conization, and laser scalpel conization.

conclusionMenopausal status and treatment procedures were associated with positive margins after therapeutic conization of CIN 3. It is important to understand the characteristics of treatment procedures and select an appropriate procedure for each case. For elderly or menopausal patients with positive margins, immediate additional treatment is recommended.

Indexed as

GynecologyObstetricsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAgedAgingConizationFemaleHumansJapanMargins of ExcisionMenopauseNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPregnancyRetrospective StudiesAgingCervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3MenopausePositive Surgical MarginTherapeutic ConizationTreatment Procedure

Identifiers

PMID34132067
PMCPMC8362807
OpenAlexW3160609445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.