Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34131869›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2021

Continuous Infusion of Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Meropenem in ICU Patients Without Renal Dysfunction: Are Patients at Risk of Underexposure?

Erika Esteve-Pitarch, Víctor Daniel Gumucio-Sanguino, Sara Cobo-Sacristán, Evelyn Shaw, Kristel Maisterra-Santos, Joan Sabater-Riera, Xosé L Pérez-Fernandez, Raül Rigo-Bonnin, Fe Tubau-Quintano, Jordi Carratalà and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erika Esteve-PitarchDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain.
Víctor Daniel Gumucio-SanguinoDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Sara Cobo-SacristánFarmacoteràpia, Farmacogenètica i Tecnologia Farmacèutica, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Evelyn ShawDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge. Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Kristel Maisterra-SantosDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan Sabater-RieraDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Xosé L Pérez-FernandezDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Raül Rigo-BonninDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
Fe Tubau-QuintanoDepartment of Microbiology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi CarratalàDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge. Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Helena Colom-Codina *Farmacoteràpia, Farmacogenètica i Tecnologia Farmacèutica, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Ariadna Padullés-Zamora *Farmacoteràpia, Farmacogenètica i Tecnologia Farmacèutica, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. apadulles@bellvitgehospital.cat.
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria SFB-ATB-2014-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesMorbidity and mortality from serious infections are common in intensive care units (ICUs). The appropriateness of the antibiotic treatment is essential to combat sepsis. We aimed to evaluate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment of meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam administered at standard total daily dose as continuous infusion in critically ill patients without renal dysfunction and to identify risk factors of non-pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment.

resultsWe included 118 patients (149 concentrations), 47% had microorganism isolation. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [median (interquartile range, IQR) values in isolated pathogens were: meropenem: 0.05 (0.02-0.12) mg/l; piperacillin: 3 (1-4) mg/l]. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainments (100%fC

conclusionStandard total daily dose of meropenem allowed achieving pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainments in ICU patients without renal dysfunction. Higher doses of piperacillin/tazobactam would be needed to cover microorganisms with MIC > 8 mg/l. CrCL was the most powerful factor predictive of fC

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousIntensive Care UnitsMaleMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID34131869
OpenAlexW3171837588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.