ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2021
"Shunt Pumping Test": role of practice on an experimental model.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo ascertain the benefits of practicing shunt pumping test on a validated experimental model.
methodsA validated experimental model of shunt was used and 25 medical professionals were asked to assess the block in the model where artificial blocks were created. The assessment was repeated after the participants had practiced on the same model. The performance of participants before and after practice was compared and statistically evaluated.
resultsThe ability to predict the status of shunt showed an improvement in all scenarios after practice. The odds ratio for predicting a blocked shunt before and after practice was 7.25 (95% credible interval: 1.50-21.01). The odds ratio for predicting a functional shunt before and after practice was 8.81 (95% credible interval of 1.64 to 13.65).
conclusionPracticing on the experimental model significantly improves the ability to predict the status of shunt. Training of primary caregivers on similar shunt models based on the shunts used in respective centers can improve an early detection of shunt block and reduce reliance on more invasive and expensive evaluation modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34131768What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.