Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34131638›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2021

Phenotypes of engagement with mobile health technology for heart rhythm monitoring.

Jihui Lee, Meghan Reading Turchioe, Ruth Masterson Creber, Angelo Biviano, Kathleen Hickey, Suzanne Bakken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jihui LeeDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Meghan Reading TurchioeDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Ruth Masterson CreberDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Angelo BivianoDepartment of Medicine-Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Kathleen HickeyColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.
Suzanne BakkenColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.
Columbia University · USWeill Cornell Medicine · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USCornell University · US

Funding

iPhone Helping Evaluate Atrial Fibrillation Rhythm through Technology (iHEART)R01NR014853 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BAKKEN, SUZANNE · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Should we return patient reported outcomes to human subjects participants?-exploring ethical obligationsR00NR016275 · NINR · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MASTERSON CREBER, RUTH MARIE · 2018 to 2020
$896k
Data-driven shared decision-making to reduce symptom burden in atrial fibrillationK99NR019124 · NINR · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI TURCHIOE, MEGHAN READING · 2020 to 2021
$175k
NINR NIH HHS K99 NR019124NINR NIH HHS R00 NR016275NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGuided by the concept of digital phenotypes, the objective of this study was to identify MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of mHealth data, surveys, and clinical records collected by participants using mHealth in a clinical trial. Patterns of participants' weekly use over 6 months were analyzed to identify engagement phenotypes via latent growth mixture model (LGMM). Multinomial logistic regression models were fitted to compute the effects of predictors on LGMM classes.

resultsOne hundred twenty-eight participants (mean age 61.9 years, 75.8% male) were included in the analysis. Application of LGMM identified 4 distinct engagement phenotypes: "High-High," "Moderate-Moderate," "High-Low," and "Moderate-Low." In multinomial models, older age, less frequent afternoon mHealth use, shorter intervals between mHealth use, more AF episodes measured directly with mHealth, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction were more strongly associated with the High-High phenotype compared to the Moderate-Low phenotype (reference). Older age, more palpitations, and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack were more strongly associated with the Moderate-Moderate phenotype compared to the reference. DISCUSSION: Engagement phenotypes provide a nuanced characterization of how individuals engage with mHealth over time, and which individuals are more likely to be highly engaged users.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that engagement phenotypes are valuable in understanding and possibly intervening upon engagement within a population, and also suggests that engagement is an important variable to be considered in digital phenotyping work more broadly.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationdigital phenotypinglatent class analysismobile healthpatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID34131638
PMCPMC8200132
OpenAlexW3170187294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.