Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34131526›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

The immediate effect of a single session of pain neuroscience education on pain and the autonomic nervous system in subjects with persistent pain, a pilot study.

Rob Sillevis, Gabriel Trincado, Eric Shamus

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05860816 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Pain Neuroscience Education Programmes for the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Pain in Primary Care Physiotherapy Units: the Physiotherapist's Perspective

TypeobservationalSponsorCastilla-León Health ServiceRan2023 to 2025Enrolled123ConditionsChronic Primary Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain, FibromyalgiaArmsSurvey
NCT06477822 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of a Sequence of Specific Manual Therapy Techniques Targeting the Autonomic Nervous System in Healthy Adults: a Single-application Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat Internacional de CatalunyaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsAutonomic ImbalanceArmsSequence of manual therapy techniques, Simulated manual therapy techniques
NCT06732778 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Women With Menstrual Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUskudar UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled74ConditionsPain Management, Dysmenorrhea (Disorder)ArmsPain Neuroscience Education (PNE), Control Group (CG)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rob SillevisRehabilitations Sciences, Florida Gulf Coast University, Ft. Myers, FL, United States of America.
Gabriel TrincadoRehabilitations Sciences, Florida Gulf Coast University, Ft. Myers, FL, United States of America.
Eric ShamusRehabilitations Sciences, Florida Gulf Coast University, Ft. Myers, FL, United States of America.
Florida Gulf Coast University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe autonomic nervous system is a system that operates at the subconscious level and has been associated with neurobehavioral aspects of pain. Overall, persistent pain has a stimulating effect on the sympathetic nervous system. A promising emerging nonpharmacological treatment to manage persistent pain is neuroscience-based pain education. The overarching goal of neuroscience-based pain education is to change cognitions about pain and the pain experience through education. The aim was to determine the immediate and short-term impact of a neuroscience-based pain education video on the autonomic nervous system and pain in a subgroup of individuals with persistent pain.

methodsA convenience sample of 26 subjects were recruited for this study. Each subject indicated their pain level at the time of testing using a Visual Analogue Scale. Automated pupillometry was utilized to measure pupil diameter. After two minutes of accommodation to the goggles, the pupil was measured continuously for 60 s. Following this a 5-minute video presentation "Understanding Pain" was watched, followed by a continuous pupil measurement for 60 s. Three minutes after this measure, the final pupil diameter measurement was taken for 60 s. After completing the final pupil measure, the subject was asked to fill out a second Visual Analogue Scale and a Global Rate of Change. OUTCOMES: Each subject completed a Global Rating of Change Scale and the mean score was 1.14 (SD = 1.61 and a SEM = 0.), supporting the hypothesis of an overall self-perceived benefit from the intervention. There was a statistically significant difference in pain following the video, DISCUSSION: This pilot study demonstrated that a 5-minute neuroscience-based pain education video reduced perceived pain in a small sample of subjects with persistent pain. Watching the neuroscience-based pain education video did not seem to result in an immediate generalized autonomic nervous system response. However, it resulted in a different reaction on each eye. This unequal response might be the result of the hemispheric lateralization of the ANS. This study supports the fact that the pain experience is determined by the balance between conscious cognitive processes and subconscious processes based on previous psychological experiences.

Indexed as

Autonomic nervous systemChronic painNeuro pain science educationPupillometry

Identifiers

PMID34131526
PMCPMC8174152
OpenAlexW3166973034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.