Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34131299›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2022

Grain consumption before and during pregnancy and birth weight in Japan: the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study.

Yudai Yonezawa, Taku Obara, Takahiro Yamashita, Mami Ishikuro, Keiko Murakami, Fumihiko Ueno, Aoi Noda, Tomomi Onuma, Junichi Sugawara, Shigenori Suzuki and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yudai YonezawaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8723-1626
Taku ObaraTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. obara-t@hosp.tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3674-1674
Takahiro YamashitaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Mami IshikuroTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Keiko MurakamiTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Fumihiko UenoTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Aoi NodaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Tomomi OnumaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Junichi SugawaraTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Shigenori SuzukiInnovation Division, KAGOME CO., LTD., Nasushiobara, Japan.
Hiroyuki SuganumaInnovation Division, KAGOME CO., LTD., Nasushiobara, Japan.
Shinichi KuriyamaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-0911

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesStudies have reported the effects of grain consumption on human health, but the association between maternal grain consumption before and during pregnancy and birth weight remains unclear. We evaluated the association between maternal grain consumption before and during pregnancy and birth weight/low birth weight (LBW). SUBJECTS/

methodsGrain consumption was calculated using two semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaires (FFQs). The two FFQs evaluated consumption from pre- to early pregnancy and then from early to mid-pregnancy, respectively. Information concerning birth weight was obtained from birth records, and multivariable analyses for birth weight and LBW risk were conducted after adjusting for potential confounders.

resultsIn total, 17,610 pregnant women (age, 31.8 ± 4.9 years; smoked during pregnancy, 16.1%; gestation period, 38.5 ± 2.5 weeks; first childbirth, 45.5%) and their singleton and term new-borns (birth weight, 3061.8 ± 354.1 g; LBW, 5.4%) were included in the analysis. Women in the highest quartile of grain consumption from pre- to early pregnancy had heavier new-borns (β = 22.3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.8-38.9) but did not have a significantly lower LBW risk (odds ratio [OR]: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.71-1.07) than women in the lowest quartile. Women in the highest quartile of grain consumption from early to mid-pregnancy also had heavier new-borns (β = 24.1; 95% CI: 7.1-41.1) but did not have a significantly lower LBW risk (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.69-1.05) than women in the lowest quartile.

conclusionsGrain consumption before and during pregnancy was positively associated with birth weight.

Indexed as

Edible GrainInfant, Low Birth WeightAdultBirth WeightCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornJapanPregnancyRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.