Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34131294›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

The sentinel node invasion level (SNIL) as a prognostic parameter in melanoma.

Lutz Kretschmer, Christina Mitteldorf, Simin Hellriegel, Andreas Leha, Alexander Fichtner, Philipp Ströbel, Michael P Schön, Felix Bremmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lutz KretschmerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany. lkre@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3260-5410
Christina MitteldorfDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Simin HellriegelDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Andreas LehaDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Alexander FichtnerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Philipp StröbelInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Michael P SchönDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Felix BremmerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node (SN) tumor burden is becoming increasingly important and is likely to be included in future N classifications in melanoma. Our aim was to investigate the prognostic significance of melanoma infiltration of various anatomically defined lymph node substructures. This retrospective cohort study included 1250 consecutive patients with SN biopsy. The pathology protocol required description of metastatic infiltration of each of the following lymph node substructures: intracapsular lymph vessels, subcapsular and transverse sinuses, cortex, paracortex, medulla, and capsule. Within the SN with the highest tumor burden, the SN invasion level (SNIL) was defined as follows: SNIL 1 = melanoma cells confined to intracapsular lymph vessels, subcapsular or transverse sinuses; SNIL 2 = melanoma infiltrating the cortex or paracortex; SNIL 3 = melanoma infiltrating the medulla or capsule. We classified 338 SN-positive patients according to the non-metric SNIL. Using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox models, recurrence-free survival (RFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and nodal basin recurrence rates were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 75 months. The SNIL divided the SN-positive population into three groups with significantly different RFS, MSS, and nodal basin recurrence probabilities. The MSS of patients with SNIL 1 was virtually identical to that of SN-negative patients, whereas outgrowth of the metastasis from the parenchyma into the fibrous capsule or the medulla of the lymph node indicated a very poor prognosis. Thus, the SNIL may help to better assess the benefit-risk ratio of adjuvant therapies in patients with different SN metastasis patterns.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph NodeSentinel Lymph Node BiopsySkin NeoplasmsSurvival RateTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID34131294
PMCPMC8443441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.