Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34131288›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

The damping and structural properties of dragonfly and damselfly wings during dynamic movement.

Carina Lietz, Clemens F Schaber, Stanislav N Gorb, Hamed Rajabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Insect Flight: State of the Field and Future Directions.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nonuniform structural properties of wings confer sensing advantages.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carina LietzInstitute of Zoology, Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-3308
Clemens F SchaberInstitute of Zoology, Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7475-8899
Stanislav N GorbInstitute of Zoology, Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9712-7953
Hamed RajabiInstitute of Zoology, Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany. harajabi@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1792-3325

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For flying insects, stability is essential to maintain the orientation and direction of motion in flight. Flight instability is caused by a variety of factors, such as intended abrupt flight manoeuvres and unwanted environmental disturbances. Although wings play a key role in insect flight stability, little is known about their oscillatory behaviour. Here we present the first systematic study of insect wing damping. We show that different wing regions have almost identical damping properties. The mean damping ratio of fresh wings is noticeably higher than that previously thought. Flight muscles and hemolymph have almost no 'direct' influence on the wing damping. In contrast, the involvement of the wing hinge can significantly increase damping. We also show that although desiccation reduces the wing damping ratio, rehydration leads to full recovery of damping properties after desiccation. Hence, we expect hemolymph to influence the wing damping indirectly, by continuously hydrating the wing system.

Indexed as

AnimalsFlight, AnimalOdonataWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID34131288
PMCPMC8206215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.