Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34131108›Full record

SynthesisTranslational psychiatry2021

Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation.

Kathrin Cohen Kadosh, Melissa Basso, Paul Knytl, Nicola Johnstone, Jennifer Y F Lau, Glenn R Gibson

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Translational psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Frontiers in physiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Zinc and Cobalt exposure influencebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kathrin Cohen KadoshSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. k.cohenkadosh@surrey.ac.uk.
Melissa BassoSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Paul KnytlSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Nicola JohnstoneSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0576-1525
Jennifer Y F LauDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Glenn R GibsonDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, The University of Reading, Reading, UK.
University of Surrey · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human gut microbiome influence on brain function and mental health is an emerging area of intensive research. Animal and human research indicates adolescence as a sensitive period when the gut-brain axis is fine-tuned, where dietary interventions to change the microbiome may have long-lasting consequences for mental health. This study reports a systematic review and meta-analysis of microbiota-targeted (psychobiotics) interventions on anxiety in youth, with discussion of a consultation on the acceptability of psychobiotic interventions for mental health management amongst youth with lived experience. Six databases were searched for controlled trials in human samples (age range: 10-24 years) seeking to reduce anxiety. Post intervention outcomes were extracted as standard mean differences (SMDs) and pooled based on a random-effects model. 5416 studies were identified: 14 eligible for systematic review and 10 eligible for meta-analysis (total of 324 experimental and 293 control subjects). The meta-analysis found heterogeneity I

Indexed as

AnxietyAnxiety DisordersAdolescentAdultChildHumansMental HealthReferral and ConsultationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34131108
PMCPMC8206413
OpenAlexW3172573294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.