Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34130709›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2021

Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral nutritional supplements with nutritional counselling in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Beatrice Martin, Emanuele Cereda, Riccardo Caccialanza, Paolo Pedrazzoli, Rosanna Tarricone, Oriana Ciani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02055833 (Intensive Nutritional Counseling in Head-neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02055833 nacompletednot on this map

Intensive Nutritional Counseling in Head-neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy: a Randomized, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di PaviaRan2013 to 2016Enrolled159ConditionsHead-neck CancerArmsIntensive nutritional counseling, Nutritional counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Malnutrition in older adults with cancer undergoing outpatient care: associated factors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Beatrice MartinDepartment of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
Emanuele CeredaClinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-1951
Riccardo CaccialanzaClinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9379-3569
Paolo PedrazzoliMedical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9419-7160
Rosanna TarriconeDepartment of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2009-9357
Oriana CianiSDA Bocconi School of Management, Centre for Research On Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Milan, Italy. oriana.ciani@unibocconi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3607-0508
Bocconi University · ITPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health RF-2011-02351315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is limited evidence regarding the economic effects of nutrition support in cancer patients. This study aims at investigating the cost-effectiveness profile of systematic oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) and receiving nutritional counseling.

methodsA cost-effectiveness analysis based on a RCT was performed to estimate direct medical costs, life years gained (LYG) and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) for nutritional counseling with or without ONS at 5-month and 6-year follow up time. Value of information analysis was performed to value the expected gain from reducing uncertainty through further data collection.

resultsONS with nutritional counseling produced higher QALY than nutritional counseling alone (0.291 ± 0.087 vs 0.288 ± 0.087), however the difference was not significant (0.0027, P = 0.84). Mean costs were €987.60 vs €996.09, respectively in the treatment and control group (-€8.96, P = 0.98). The Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was -€3,277/QALY, with 55.4% probabilities of being cost-effective at a cost-effectiveness threshold of €30,000/QALY. The Expected Incremental Benefit was €95.16 and the Population Expected Value of Perfect Information was €8.6 million, implying that additional research is likely to be worthwhile. At a median 6-year follow up, the treatment group had a significantly better survival rate when adjusting for late effect (P = 0.039).

conclusionOur findings provide the first evidence to inform decisions about funding and reimbursement of ONS in combination with nutritional counseling in HNC patients undergoing RT. ONS may improve quality of cancer care at no additional costs, however further research on the cost-effectiveness of nutritional supplementation is recommended.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02055833. Registered 5th February 2014 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02055833.

Identifiers

PMID34130709
PMCPMC8207624
OpenAlexW3168955582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.