Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34130692›Full record

SynthesisBiomedical engineering online2021

Biomedical signals and machine learning in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review.

Felipe Fernandes, Ingridy Barbalho, Daniele Barros, Ricardo Valentim, César Teixeira, Jorge Henriques, Paulo Gil, Mário Dourado Júnior

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biomedical engineering online, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Felipe Fernandes *Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil. felipe.ricardo@lais.huol.ufrn.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0805-1796
Ingridy Barbalho *Laboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Daniele BarrosLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Ricardo ValentimLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil.
César TeixeiraDepartment of Informatics Engineering, Univ Coimbra, CISUC-Center for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Jorge HenriquesDepartment of Informatics Engineering, Univ Coimbra, CISUC-Center for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Paulo GilDepartment of Informatics Engineering, Univ Coimbra, CISUC-Center for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Mário Dourado JúniorLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of machine learning (ML) techniques in healthcare encompasses an emerging concept that envisages vast contributions to the tackling of rare diseases. In this scenario, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) involves complexities that are yet not demystified. In ALS, the biomedical signals present themselves as potential biomarkers that, when used in tandem with smart algorithms, can be useful to applications within the context of the disease.

methodsThis Systematic Literature Review (SLR) consists of searching for and investigating primary studies that use ML techniques and biomedical signals related to ALS. Following the definition and execution of the SLR protocol, 18 articles met the inclusion, exclusion, and quality assessment criteria, and answered the SLR research questions. DISCUSSIONS: Based on the results, we identified three classes of ML applications combined with biomedical signals in the context of ALS: diagnosis (72.22%), communication (22.22%), and survival prediction (5.56%).

conclusionsDistinct algorithmic models and biomedical signals have been reported and present promising approaches, regardless of their classes. In summary, this SLR provides an overview of the primary studies analyzed as well as directions for the construction and evolution of technology-based research within the scope of ALS.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisMachine LearningHumansSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis—ALSArtificial intelligenceBiomedical signalsChronic neurological conditionsMachine learningMotor neuron diseaseSignal processing

Identifiers

PMID34130692
PMCPMC8207575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.