ArticleBMC public health2021
The status of health promotion lifestyle and its related factors in Shandong Province, China.
Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rural residents' cognition of healthy lifestyles: a qualitative study in Shanxi Province, China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Building and Validating an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Health-Promoting Behaviors in Older Adults: A Multicenter Study.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
- Lung cancer in the socioeconomic and environmental context of the Amazon region of Pará.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
- The effect of integration of medical and preventive services on the prevention and control of public health emergencies in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Health literacy, social support, and health activation as determinants of health-promoting behaviors in patients with chronic heart failure: a COM-B model-based path analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Association between community-based health services and health lifestyles of older adults: evidence from China.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the older adult lifestyle scale: a translation and validation study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Unsupervised clustering analysis of comprehensive health status and its influencing factors on women of childbearing age: a cross-sectional study from a province in central China.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Health-promoting lifestyle and its predictors among health-related and non-health-related university students in Taiwan: a cross-sectional quantitative study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Socioecological influencers of health-promoting lifestyles in Chinese: a preliminary survey using convenient samples.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Unraveling the Role of Objective Food Environment in Chinese Elderly's Diet-Related Diseases Epidemic: Considering Both Healthy Food Accessibility and Diversity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- How to make more people adopt healthy behaviors? Assessing health literacy, health promoting lifestyle and their association of community residents in Shenzhen, China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to explore the status of Shandong Province, China residents' health promotion lifestyle and its influencing factors, especially to explore how health attitude affects health promotion lifestyle, thus can make targeted recommendations for health promotion in China and similar areas.
methods1800 adults were selected from urban and rural areas of Shandong Province, China, using multistage stratified, cluster random sampling method. A survey was conducted face-to-face from March to May, 2018, using Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile and Health Attitude Questionnaire. The between-group measured data were compared by One-way ANOVA or t-tests. The correlation between the health attitude and health promotion lifestyle was examined by Pearson correlation. Logistic regression model was used to examine the related factors influencing health promotion lifestyle. Health promotion lifestyle is the dependent variable, and gender, education level, annual family per capita income and health attitude are the independent variables.
resultsThe mean (SD) of HPLP-IICR total score of the participants was 82.12(16.63). 54.50% of the participants had poor or average health promotion lifestyle, while 45.50% had good or excellent health promotion lifestyle. Significant differences existed in health promotion lifestyle among different gender, education level, income level, marital status, and health attitude (Ps < 0.001). Multivariable Logistic regression model found that male (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.12-0.34), high school education level (OR = 0.57, 95% CI:0.17-0.41), junior middle school & below (OR = 0.42; 95% CI:0.12-0.33), annual family per capita income with < 10,000 CNY (OR = 2.53, 95% CI:1.24-2.06; OR = 2.14, 95% CI:1.08-3.12), low health affection (OR = 0.39, 95% CI:2.15-4.22), and low health behavioral intention (OR = 0.21; 95% CI: 2.33-5.29) were statistically significant correlates of average or poor health promotion lifestyle.
conclusionsThe health lifestyle needs to be further promoted in Shandong Province, China. The government and social sectors are encouraged to make more efforts to improve the accessibility and quality of health services. Meanwhile, individual responsibility cannot be ignored as well. More affective factors and operable measures should be added to enhance health affection and health behavioral intention, so as to enhance health promotion lifestyle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.