ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021
Simulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- DiscoVir: an automated, web-based pipeline for viral metagenomics.Microbiology resource announcements · 2026Article
- The Unified Human Virome Database: A toolkit for expanded human virome analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Picobirnavirus: how do you find where it's hiding?Critical reviews in microbiology · 2026Review
- Bacteriophages in gut metagenomes: from analysis to application.Virology journal · 2026Review
- The respiratory tract virome: unravelling the role of viral dark matter in respiratory health and disease.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Review
- Phages-bacteria interactions underlying the dynamics of polyhydroxyalkanoate-producing mixed microbial cultures via meta-omics study.mSystems · 2025Article
- Comparison between metatranscriptomics and viral metagenomics, 16S, and host transcriptomics for comprehensive profiling of the respiratory microbiome and host response.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Benchmarking bioinformatic virus identification tools using real-world metagenomic data across biomes.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Correlation between the gut microbiome and neurodegenerative diseases: a review of metagenomics evidence.Neural regeneration research · 2024Review
- Benchmarking informatics approaches for virus discovery: caution is needed when combiningmSystems · 2024Article
- Large language models improve annotation of prokaryotic viral proteins.Nature microbiology · 2024Article
- The Upper Respiratory Tract Microbiome Network Impacted by SARS-CoV-2.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Current trends in RNA virus detection through metatranscriptome sequencing data.FEBS open bio · 2023Review
- Metaviromic analyses of DNA virus community from sediments of the N-Choe stream, North India.Virus research · 2023Article
- Large language models improve annotation of viral proteins.Research square · 2023Article
- Benchmarking machine learning robustness in Covid-19 genome sequence classification.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- ViralCC retrieves complete viral genomes and virus-host pairs from metagenomic Hi-C data.Nature communications · 2023Article
- The Emerging Role of the Gut Virome in Health and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Challenges, Covariates and a Viral Imbalance.Viruses · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundViruses, including bacteriophages, are important components of environmental and human associated microbial communities. Viruses can act as extracellular reservoirs of bacterial genes, can mediate microbiome dynamics, and can influence the virulence of clinical pathogens. Various targeted metagenomic analysis techniques detect viral sequences, but these methods often exclude large and genome integrated viruses. In this study, we evaluate and compare the ability of nine state-of-the-art bioinformatic tools, including Vibrant, VirSorter, VirSorter2, VirFinder, DeepVirFinder, MetaPhinder, Kraken 2, Phybrid, and a BLAST search using identified proteins from the Earth Virome Pipeline to identify viral contiguous sequences (contigs) across simulated metagenomes with different read distributions, taxonomic compositions, and complexities.
resultsOf the tools tested in this study, VirSorter achieved the best F1 score while Vibrant had the highest average F1 score at predicting integrated prophages. Though less balanced in its precision and recall, Kraken2 had the highest average precision by a substantial margin. We introduced the machine learning tool, Phybrid, which demonstrated an improvement in average F1 score over tools such as MetaPhinder. The tool utilizes machine learning with both gene content and nucleotide features. The addition of nucleotide features improves the precision and recall compared to the gene content features alone.Viral identification by all tools was not impacted by underlying read distribution but did improve with contig length. Tool performance was inversely related to taxonomic complexity and varied by the phage host. For instance, Rhizobium and Enterococcus phages were identified consistently by the tools; whereas, Neisseria prophage sequences were commonly missed in this study.
conclusionThis study benchmarked the performance of nine state-of-the-art bioinformatic tools to identify viral contigs across different simulation conditions. This study explored the ability of the tools to identify integrated prophage elements traditionally excluded from targeted sequencing approaches. Our comprehensive analysis of viral identification tools to assess their performance in a variety of situations provides valuable insights to viral researchers looking to mine viral elements from publicly available metagenomic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.