Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34130525›Full record

SynthesisCephalalgia : an international journal of headache2021

CGRP-antibodies, topiramate and botulinum toxin type A in episodic and chronic migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Florian Frank, Hanno Ulmer, Victoria Sidoroff, Gregor Broessner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Drugs for Migraine Prophylaxis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Florian FrankDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7236-5557
Hanno UlmerDepartment of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Victoria SidoroffDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gregor BroessnerDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe approval of monoclonal antibodies for prevention of migraine has revolutionized treatment for patients. Oral preventatives are still considered first line treatments as head-to-head trials comparing them with antibodies are lacking.

methodsThe main purpose of this study was to provide a comparative overview of the efficacy of three commonly prescribed migraine preventative medication classes. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the databases CENTRAL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE until 20 March 2020. We included RCTs reporting the 50% response rates for topiramate, Botulinum Toxin Type A and monoclonal antibodies against CGRP(r). Studies were excluded if response rates were not reported, treatment allocation was unclear, or if study quality was insufficient. Primary outcome measure were the 50% response rates. The pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated with the random effects model. The study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020222880).

findingsWe identified 6552 reports. Thirty-two were eligible for our review. Studies assessing monoclonal antibodies included 13,302 patients and yielded pooled odds ratios for the 50% response rate of 2.30 (CI: 2.11-2.50). Topiramate had an overall effect estimate of 2.70 (CI: 1.97-3.69) with 1989 included patients and Botulinum Toxin Type A achieved 1.28 (CI: 0.98-1. 67) with 2472 patients included.

interpretationTopiramate, botulinum toxin type A and monoclonal antibodies showed higher odds ratios in achieving a 50% response rate compared to placebo. Topiramate numerically demonstrated the greatest effect size but also the highest drop-out rate.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AMigraine DisordersAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideHumansTopiramateAntibodies, MonoclonalBotulinum Toxins, Type ACalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideTopiramateefficacyMigraine disordersoutcomepreventionresponder ratetreatment

Identifiers

PMID34130525
PMCPMC8506070
OpenAlexW3169160240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.