Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34129705›Full record

ArticlePharmacotherapy2021

Risks and mitigation strategies to prevent etoposide infusion-related reactions in children.

Emma M Tillman, Sarah L Suppes, Nicholas Miles, Ashley M Duty, Kelsey L Kelley, Jennifer L Goldman

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Etoposide hypersensitivity reactions associated with in-line filter use: A retrospective cohort study at CHU de Québec-Université Laval.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  4. Multidisciplinary Approach to Deciphering Etoposide Infusion Reactions and Potential Role of Polyethersulfone Filter Membranes.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma M TillmanDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8019-9811
Sarah L SuppesDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutic Innovation, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Nicholas MilesDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Ashley M DutyDepartment of Pharmacy, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Kelsey L KelleyDepartment of Pharmacy, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Jennifer L GoldmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital and the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Children's Mercy Hospital · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

Indiana University Comprehensive Training in Clinical PharmacologyT32GM008425 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Zeruesenay Desta, Michael Thomas Eadon · 1992 to 2026
$7.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Etoposide is an antineoplastic agent widely used for treatment of many pediatric cancers. Etoposide has been associated with infusion-related reactions. In this brief report, we compare etoposide infusion-related reactions that occurred over a 10-year period at two freestanding pediatric hospitals. Infusion reactions occurred in 1% of patients at two hospitals across the study period. Rates of 4.8%, 3.4%, and 7.9% were observed at Children's Mercy Hospital during 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively, after the implementation of in-line filters during etoposide infusions in late 2017. Of the 32 patients who experienced adverse reactions, 41% were rechallenged after the reaction and all were able to tolerate at least one future dose with either pre-treatment or extending infusion duration. This work highlights the importance of a multicenter approach to investigating adverse drug reactions (ADRs) as variation in practice can provide key information about ADRs and potential risk factors.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEtoposideNeoplasmsChildHumansInfusions, IntravenousRisk FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsEtoposidechilddrug hypersensitivitydrug-related side effects and adverse reactions

Identifiers

PMID34129705
PMCPMC8617599
OpenAlexW3167244533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.