Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34129630›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Positioning the National Health Insurance for financial sustainability and Universal Health Coverage in Ghana: A qualitative study among key stakeholders.

Moses Aikins, Philip Teg-Nefaah Tabong, Paola Salari, Fabrizio Tediosi, Francis M Asenso-Boadi, Patricia Akweongo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Moses AikinsDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra.
Philip Teg-Nefaah TabongDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra.ORCID 0000-0001-9445-1643
Paola SalariSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3757-6081
Fabrizio TediosiSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8671-9400
Francis M Asenso-BoadiNational Health Insurance Authority, Accra, Ghana.
Patricia AkweongoDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra.
University of Ghana · GHSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHGhana Health Service · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) was introduced in 2003 to reduce "out-of-pocket" payments for health care in Ghana. Over a decade of its implementation, issues about the financial sustainability of this pro-poor policy remains a crippling fact despite its critical role to go towards Universal Health Coverage. We therefore conducted this study to elicit stakeholders' views on ways to improve the financial sustainability of the operations of NHIS.

methodsTwenty (20) stakeholders were identified from Ministry of Health, Ghana Health Services, health workers groups, private medical practitioners, civil society organizations and developmental partners. They were interviewed using an interview guide developed from a NHIS policy review and analysis. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed thematically with the aid of NVivo 12 software.

resultsStakeholders admitted that the NHIS is currently unable to meet its financial obligations. The stakeholders suggested first the adoption of capitation as a provider payment mechanism to minimize the risk of providers' fraud and protection from political interference. Secondly, they indicated that rapid releases of specific statutory deductions and taxes for NHIS providers could reduce delays in claims' reimbursement which is one of the main challenges faced by healthcare providers. Aligning the NHIS with the Community-based Health Planning and Services and including preventive and promotive health is necessary to position the Scheme for Universal Health Coverage.

conclusionThe Scheme will potentially achieve UHC if protected from political interference to improve the governance and transparency that affects the finances of the scheme and the expansion of services to include preventive and promotive services and cancers.

Indexed as

GhanaHealth PolicyHumansInterviews as TopicNational Health ProgramsQualitative ResearchUnited StatesUniversal Health Insurance

Identifiers

PMID34129630
PMCPMC8205146
OpenAlexW3172295726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.