ArticlePloS one2021
COVID-19 vaccine prioritization of incarcerated people relative to other vulnerable groups: An analysis of state plans.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Respect for bioethical principles and human rights in prisons: a systematic review on the state of the art.BMC medical ethics · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on people experiencing incarceration: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Who is worthy of protection? Revisiting a theoretical model on the social origins of health inequities during the COVID-19 pandemic.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2026Review
- Article
- Allocating health care resources in jails and prisons during COVID-19: a qualitative study of carceral decision-makers.Health affairs scholar · 2024Article
- Controlling COVID-19 outbreaks in the correctional setting: A mathematical modelling study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Self-rated health impact of COVID 19 confinement on inmates in Southeastern of Europe: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Trends in COVID-19 and influenza vaccine ordering and distribution in Massachusetts jails.Vaccine · 2023Article
- Dynamic Contact Networks of Residents of an Urban Jail in the Era of SARS-CoV-2.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Coronavirus Disease-2019 Vaccine Hesitancy.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2023Review
- Perceptions of vaccine safety and hesitancy among incarcerated adults and correctional staff in the rural midwest.Vaccine: X · 2023Article
- The COVID-19 pandemic behind bars: Experimental evidence showing higher support for decarceration when framed as risk to correctional staff.SSM - population health · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines Among Incarcerated People in California State Prisons: Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022Article
- Article
- Vaccine Effectiveness during Outbreak of COVID-19 Alpha (B.1.1.7) Variant in Men's Correctional Facility, United States.Emerging infectious diseases · 2022Review
- [COVID-19 vaccinations in institutions for forensic commitment: some considerations on ethical and medico-legal aspects].Der Nervenarzt · 2022Article
- The Risk of COVID-19 Infection in Prisons and Prevention Strategies: A Systematic Review and a New Strategic Protocol of Prevention.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- COVID-19 vaccine for people who live and work in prisons worldwide: A scoping review.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Health care disparities during the COVID-19 pandemic.Seminars in vascular surgery · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCarceral facilities are epicenters of the COVID-19 pandemic, placing incarcerated people at an elevated risk of COVID-19 infection. Due to the initial limited availability of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States, all states have developed allocation plans that outline a phased distribution. This study uses document analysis to compare the relative prioritization of incarcerated people, correctional staff, and other groups at increased risk of COVID-19 infection and morbidity. METHODS AND
findingsWe conducted a document analysis of the vaccine dissemination plans of all 50 US states and the District of Columbia using a triple-coding method. Documents included state COVID-19 vaccination plans and supplemental materials on vaccine prioritization from state health department websites as of December 31, 2020. We found that 22% of states prioritized incarcerated people in Phase 1, 29% of states in Phase 2, and 2% in Phase 3, while 47% of states did not explicitly specify in which phase people who are incarcerated will be eligible for vaccination. Incarcerated people were consistently not prioritized in Phase 1, while other vulnerable groups who shared similar environmental risk received this early prioritization. States' plans prioritized in Phase 1: prison and jail workers (49%), law enforcement (63%), seniors (65+ years, 59%), and long-term care facility residents (100%).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that states' COVID-19 vaccine allocation plans do not prioritize incarcerated people and provide little to no guidance on vaccination protocols if they fall under other high-risk categories that receive earlier priority. Deprioritizing incarcerated people for vaccination misses a crucial opportunity for COVID-19 mitigation. It also raises ethical and equity concerns. As states move forward with their vaccine distribution, further work must be done to prioritize ethical allocation and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines to incarcerated people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.