Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34129610›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Can a social media intervention improve online communication about suicide? A feasibility study examining the acceptability and potential impact of the #chatsafe campaign.

Louise La Sala, Zoe Teh, Michelle Lamblin, Gowri Rajaram, Simon Rice, Nicole T M Hill, Pinar Thorn, Karolina Krysinska, Jo Robinson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06364332 (Testing the Impact of #ChatsafeNL in a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06364332 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Testing the Impact of #ChatsafeNL in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Does a Social Media Intervention Improve Dutch Young People's Safe Online Communication About Suicide?

TypeinterventionalSponsor113 Suicide PreventionRan2024 to 2025Enrolled400ConditionsSuicide Prevention, Communication, Social MediaArmsSocial Media campaign
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The #chatsafe Youth Participation Model: Evaluating Participatory Workshops Involving Young People in the Design of Suicide Prevention Initiatives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A Double-Edged Sword Perspective on Young Australians' Use of Social Media: A Structured Narrative Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Editorial: Digital suicide prevention.Frontiers in digital health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Louise La SalaOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6736-6977
Zoe TehOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Michelle LamblinOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Gowri RajaramOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Simon RiceOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Nicole T M HillOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Pinar ThornOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Karolina KrysinskaOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Jo RobinsonOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need for effective and youth-friendly approaches to suicide prevention, and social media presents a unique opportunity to reach young people. Although there is some evidence to support the delivery of population-wide suicide prevention campaigns, little is known about their capacity to change behaviour, particularly among young people and in the context of social media. Even less is known about the safety and feasibility of using social media for the purpose of suicide prevention. Based on the #chatsafe guidelines, this study examines the acceptability, safety and feasibility of a co-designed social media campaign. It also examines its impact on young people's willingness to intervene against suicide and their perceived self-efficacy, confidence and safety when communicating on social media platforms about suicide. A sample of 189 young people aged 16-25 years completed three questionnaires across a 20-week period (4 weeks pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at 4-week follow up). The intervention took the form of a 12-week social media campaign delivered to participants via direct message. Participants reported finding the intervention acceptable and they also reported improvements in their willingness to intervene against suicide, and their perceived self-efficacy, confidence and safety when communicating on social media about suicide. Findings from this study present a promising picture for the acceptability and potential impact of a universal suicide prevention campaign delivered through social media, and suggest that it can be safe to utilize social media for the purpose of suicide prevention.

Indexed as

CommunicationSocial MediaSuicide PreventionAdolescentAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleSelf ConceptSelf EfficacyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34129610
PMCPMC8205132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.