Trial reportMuscle & nerve2021
Long-term efficacy and safety of dichlorphenamide for treatment of primary periodic paralysis.
Trial report in Muscle & nerve, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term efficacy and safety of dichlorphenamide for treatment of primary periodic paralysis.Muscle & nerve · 2021Trial
- Permanent weakness and myopathy in hypokalemic periodic paralysis.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2026Review
- Molecular genetics of skeletal muscle channelopathies.Journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Optical measurement of gating pore currents in hypokalemic periodic paralysis model cells.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimLong-term efficacy and safety of dichlorphenamide (DCP) were characterized in patients with primary periodic paralysis (PPP).
methodsPatients with PPP in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study were randomly assigned to receive DCP 50 mg twice daily or placebo for 9 weeks, followed by a 52-week open-label DCP treatment phase (DCP/DCP and placebo/DCP populations). Efficacy (attack rate, severity-weighted attack rate) and safety were assessed in patients completing the study (61 weeks). In this post hoc analysis, efficacy and safety data were pooled from hyperkalemic and hypokalemic substudies.
resultsSixty-three adults (age, 19-76 years) completed the double-blind phase; 47 (74.6%) of these patients completed 61 weeks. There were median decreases in weekly attack and severity-weighted attack rates from baseline to week 61 (DCP/DCP [n = 25], -1.00 [P < .0001]; placebo/DCP [n = 20], -0.63 [P = .01] and DCP/DCP, -2.25 [P < .0001]; placebo/DCP, -1.69 [P = .01]). Relatively smaller median decreases in weekly attack and severity-weighted attack rates occurred from weeks 9 to 61 among patients receiving DCP continuously (n = 26; -0.14 [P = .1] and -0.24 [P = .09]) than among those switching from placebo to DCP after 9 weeks (n = 16; -1.04 [P = .049] and -2.72 [P = .08]). Common adverse events (AEs) were paresthesia and cognition-related events, which typically first occurred within 1 month of blinded treatment initiation and in rare cases led to treatment discontinuation. Dose reductions were frequently associated with common AE resolution. DISCUSSION: One-year open-label DCP treatment after a 9-week randomized, controlled study confirmed long-term DCP remains safe and effective for chronic use. Tolerability issues (paresthesia, cognition-related AEs) were manageable in most patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.