ArticleInternational ophthalmology2021
Surgical success of lateral rectus resection for residual and recurrent esotropia.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the surgical outcomes of reoperations for residual and recurrent esotropia.
methodsA retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent surgery during 2000-2017 at a tertiary referral medical center for recurrent or residual esotropia was conducted. Patients who underwent bilateral medial rectus recession as primary surgery and lateral rectus resection as second surgery were included. The success rate of second surgery and its association to various factors were examined. Success of reoperation was defined as mean deviation of < 10 prism diopters (= PD) at last follow-up.
resultsTwenty-seven patients with mean post-operative follow-up of 50.4 ± 31.7 months were included. On last follow-up examination, 15 (55.6%) patients had a successful reoperation and 12 (44.4%) patients had unsuccessful reoperation. The two groups were similar in the pre-operative amount of esotropia for distance and near. On last follow-up examination, the amount of mean deviation was 1.9 PD esotropia (8 PD exotropia to 9 PD esotropia) in the success group and 11.2 PD esotropia (22.5 PD exotropia to 35 PD esotropia) in the failure group. In the failure group, 75.0% of patients were under-corrected (esotropia of ≥ 10 PD) on last follow-up examination.
conclusionStrabismus reoperation in cases of residual or recurrent esotropia was successful in slightly more than half of the patients. Surgical failure was more commonly associated with undercorrection and less with overcorrection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.