ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2021
Imaging evaluation of uterine perforation and rupture.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute and chronic complications of cesarean delivery: An update for the general radiologist.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Outcomes from blind versus ultrasound-guided uterine evacuation: A retrospective cohort analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Early and delayed post-cesarean complications: an imaging review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Third-trimester uterine rupture following previous salpingectomy for interstitial pregnancy: radiologic and surgical insights.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Ruptured uterus: a rare and catastrophic complication of molar pregnancy.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Spontaneous uterine rupture as a life-threatening presentation of molar pregnancy: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Asymptomatic Uterine Rupture at 20 Weeks of Gestation: A Case Report and Review of Literature.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Spontaneous uterine rupture in a non-gravid, unscarred uterus secondary to fulminant pelvic infection: a case report.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Article
- First-trimester uterine rupture in a scarred uterus: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Imaging in Acute Obstetric Conditions: A Pictorial Essay.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Diagnosis, management and outcomes of incarceration or intussusception of Fallopian tubes following uterine perforation after vacuum aspiration or dilatation and curettage of the uterine cavity: a systematic review of the literature.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025Article
- Fetus in the Abdominal Cavity After Uterine Rupture in a Primigravida Post-Adenomyosis Enucleation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Rare Occurrence of Uterine Perforation Following the Dilation and Curettage for Missed Abortion.Cureus · 2024Article
- A rare case of uterine rupture in the first trimester of pregnancy: Case report and review of literature.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Vaginal Bleeding Due to Iatrogenic Uterine Perforation - A Case Report.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Gynaecological Causes of Acute Pelvic Pain: Common and Not-So-Common Imaging Findings.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Imaging of Acute Abdominopelvic Pain in Pregnancy and Puerperium-Part I: Obstetric (Non-Fetal) Complications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Uterine Perforation as a Complication of the Intrauterine Procedures Causing Omentum Incarceration: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine perforation and rupture, denoting iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic uterine wall injury, respectively, are associated with substantial morbidity,and at times mortality. Diverse conditions can result in injury to both the gravid and the non-gravid uterus, and imaging plays a central role in diagnosis of such suspected cases. Ultrasound (US) is the initial imaging modality of choice, depicting the secondary signs associated with uterine wall injury and occasionally revealing the site of perforation. Computed tomography can be selectively used to complement US findings, to provide a more comprehensive picture, and to investigate complications beyond the reach of US, such as bowel injury. In certain scenarios, magnetic resonance imaging can be an important problem-solving tool as well. Finally, catheter angiography is a valuable tool with both diagnostic and therapeutic capability, with potential for fertility preservation. In this manuscript, we will highlight the clinical and imaging approach to uterine perforation and rupture, while emphasizing the value of various imaging modalities in this context. In addition, we will review the multi-modality imaging features of uterine perforation and rupture and will address the role of the radiologist as a crucial member of the management team. Finally, a summary diagrammatic depiction of imaging approach to patients presenting with uterine perforation or rupture is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.