Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34128776›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2021

Undergraduate medical education amid COVID-19: a qualitative analysis of enablers and barriers to acquiring competencies in distant learning using focus groups.

Anika Reinhart, Bastian Malzkorn, Carsten Döing, Ines Beyer, Jana Jünger, Hans Martin Bosse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. E-learning Challenges among Healthcare Students: A Scoping Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anika ReinhartDepartment of General Paediatrics, Neonatology, and Paediatric Cardiology, Düsseldorf University Department (UKD), Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Bastian MalzkornMedical Didactics Office, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Carsten DöingDepartment of General Paediatrics, Neonatology, and Paediatric Cardiology, Düsseldorf University Department (UKD), Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ines BeyerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Düsseldorf University Department (UKD), Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jana JüngerThe German National Institute for State Examinations in Medicine, Pharmacy and Psychotherapy, Mainz, Germany.
Hans Martin BosseDepartment of General Paediatrics, Neonatology, and Paediatric Cardiology, Düsseldorf University Department (UKD), Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7888-9434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to comprehensive social distancing measures related to the COVID-19 pandemic, medical faculties worldwide have made a virtue of necessity in resorting to online teaching. Medical faculties grapple with how to convey clinical competencies to students in this context. There is a need for research not only to map but also to explain the effect of these secondary measures on students' learning and mental wellbeing. During a period of ongoing comprehensive social distancing measures in Germany, we translated a competency-based curriculum including obstetrics, paediatrics, and human genetics to an e-learning course based on online patient and teacher encounters. In our qualitative study on students' and teachers' views, we identify potential enablers and drivers as well as barriers and challenges to undergraduate medical education under lockdown. In summer 2020, we conducted six focus group interviews to investigate medical students' and teachers' perspectives, experiences and attitudes. All focus groups were videotaped, transcribed verbatim and coded. To guide our deductive and inductive analysis, we applied the theoretical framework of Regmi and Jones. Content analysis was performed in a multi-perspective group. We identified five major themes contributing to a successful use of clinical competency-based e-learning under lockdown: Communication (with teachers, students, and patients), Mental wellbeing, Structure and self-organization, Technical issues, and Learning and commitment. We discuss enablers and potential barriers within all themes and their overlap and link them in an explanatory model. In our setting, students and teachers find e-learning holds strong potential and especially in times of COVID-19 it is greatly appreciated. We broaden the understanding of the impact of distant learning on acquiring competencies, on attitudes, and on mental wellbeing. Our model may serve for a thoughtful, necessary transition to future e-learning and hybrid programs for a competency-based medical education with ongoing social distancing measures.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceAdultClinical CompetenceCompetency-Based EducationCOVID-19CurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFaculty, MedicalFocus GroupsGermanyHumansMalePandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Students, Medicalclinical competenceCOVID-19 pandemice-learningmental healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID34128776
PMCPMC8208109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.