Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34128597›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2021

Developing a Framework for Pandemic COVID-19 Vaccine Allocation: a Modified Delphi Consensus Study in Korea.

Min Joo Choi, Won Suk Choi, Hye Seong, Jun Yong Choi, Jong Hyun Kim, Yae Jean Kim, Eun Young Cho, Dong Hyun Kim, Hyesook Park, Heeyoung Lee and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Adult Immunization Policy in Korea.Infection & chemotherapy · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Min Joo Choi *Department of Internal Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2739-0948
Won Suk Choi *Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5874-4764
Hye SeongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5633-7214
Jun Yong ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2775-3315
Jong Hyun KimDepartment of Pediatrics, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8641-7904
Yae Jean KimDepartment of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8367-3424
Eun Young ChoDepartment of Pediatrics, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2286-4593
Dong Hyun KimDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1492-5253
Hyesook ParkDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Graduate Program in System Health Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9359-6522
Heeyoung LeeCenter for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4830-9851
Nam Joong KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6793-9467
Joon Young SongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0148-7194
Hee Jin CheongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2532-1463
Sang Il KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9361-7381
Kyong Ran PeckDepartment of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. krpeck@skku.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7464-9780
Korea University Medical Center · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRCatholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital · KRChungnam National University Hospital · KREwha Womans University · KRHallym University · KRSeoul National University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency 2020-E2405-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study presents a framework for determining the allocation and distribution of the limited amount of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

methodsAfter analyzing the pandemic strategies of the major organizations and countries and with a literature review conducted by a core panel, a modified Delphi survey was administered to 13 experts in the fields of vaccination, infectious disease, and public health in the Republic of Korea. The following topics were discussed: 1) identifying the objectives of the vaccination strategy, 2) identifying allocation criteria, and 3) establishing a step-by-step vaccination framework and prioritization strategy based on the allocation criteria. Two rounds of surveys were conducted for each topic, with a structured questionnaire provided via e-mail in the first round. After analyzing the responses, a meeting with the experts was held to obtain consensus on how to prioritize the population groups.

resultsThe first objective of the vaccination strategy was maintenance of the integrity of the healthcare system and critical infrastructure, followed by reduction of morbidity and mortality and reduction of community transmission. In the initial phase, older adult residents in care homes, high-risk health and social care workers, and personal support workers who work in direct contact with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients would be prioritized. Expansion of vaccine supply would allow immunization of older adults not included in phase 1, followed by healthcare workers not previously included and individuals with comorbidities. Further widespread vaccine supply would ensure availability to the extended adult age groups (50-64 years old), critical workers outside the health sector, residents who cannot socially distance, and, eventually, the remaining populations.

conclusionThis survey provides the much needed insight into the decision-making process for vaccine allocation at the national level. However, flexibility in adapting to strategies will be essential, as new information is constantly emerging.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueResource AllocationSARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDecision MakingHealth PersonnelHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19DistributionKoreaPolicySurveyVaccines

Identifiers

PMID34128597
PMCPMC8203851
OpenAlexW3166530492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.