Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34128585›Full record

ReviewTopics in cognitive science2022

Similarities between Cognitive Models of Language Production and Everyday Functioning: Implications for Development of Interventions for Functional Difficulties.

Rachel Mis, Tania Giovannetti

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Topics in cognitive science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel MisDepartment of Psychology, Temple University.ORCID 0000-0001-5661-152X
Tania GiovannettiDepartment of Psychology, Temple University.
Temple University · US

Funding

Assessing Everyday Function in Older Adults with the Virtual KitchenR01AG062503 · NIA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GIOVANNETTI, TANIA · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
Improving Everyday Task Performance through Repeated Practice in Virtual RealityR21AG066771 · NIA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GIOVANNETTI, TANIA · 2020 to 2021
$438k
Feasibility of the SmartPrompt for Improving Everyday Function in DementiaR21AG060422 · NIA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GIOVANNETTI, TANIA · 2019 to 2020
$426k
Naturalistic Eye Movements as Clinical Markers of Everyday Cognition in Older AdultsF31AG071118 · NIA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI MIS, RACHEL · 2021 to 2022
$56k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG071118NIA NIH HHS F31AG071118NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062503NIA NIH HHS R01AG062503NIA NIH HHS R21 AG060422NIA NIH HHS R21AG060422NIA NIH HHS R21 AG066771NIA NIH HHS R21AG066771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The loss of the ability to independently complete activities of daily living, such as meal preparation and household chores, is a defining characteristic of clinical dementia; however, minor difficulties in completing everyday activities emerge in the mild cognitive impairment stage, and even healthy older adults exhibit subtle functional difficulties compared to younger adults. These functional difficulties are associated with an array of negative outcomes, including decreased quality of life, higher costs of care, and increased frustration, depression, caregiver burden, and institutionalization. While cognitive models have been proposed to explain the functional deficits seen in dementia and subtler forms of cognitive decline, in contrast to other cognitive disorders such as aphasia, there are essentially no theoretically motivated interventions to address difficulties in everyday functioning. Proposed models of functional impairment share features with cognitive processing models of language, including hierarchical organization of representations and interactive, spreading activation; thus, an examination of aphasia interventions has the potential to inform the development of theoretically motivated interventions for everyday activities. This review first addresses the shared characteristics of cognitive models of everyday function and language, with a focus on linguistic production. Next, we will present aphasia interventions that target single-word production, sentence production, short-term memory, and semantics, and discuss their implications for everyday functioning interventions. We conclude with a discussion of limitations of the language-everyday functioning comparison as well as areas of future research.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingDementiaAgedCognitionHumansLanguageNeuropsychological TestsQuality of LifeActivities of daily livingAphasiaInstrumental activities of daily livingNaturalistic actionTreatment

Identifiers

PMID34128585
PMCPMC8669002
OpenAlexW3173135336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.