Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34128556›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging2021

Fiber orientation distribution from diffusion MRI: Effects of inaccurate response function calibration.

Fenghua Guo, Chantal M W Tax, Alberto De Luca, Max A Viergever, Anneriet Heemskerk, Alexander Leemans

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fixel-Based Analysis Reveals Tau-Related White Matter Changes in Early Stages of Alzheimer's Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Fiber orientation distribution from diffusion MRI: Effects of inaccurate response function calibration.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Fenghua GuoImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6884-1864
Chantal M W TaxImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Alberto De LucaImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Max A ViergeverImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Anneriet HeemskerkImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Alexander LeemansImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDiffusion MRI of the brain enables to quantify white matter fiber orientations noninvasively. Several approaches have been proposed to estimate such characteristics from diffusion MRI data with spherical deconvolution being one of the most widely used methods. Spherical deconvolution requires to define--or derive from the data--a response function, which is used to compute the fiber orientation distribution (FOD). Different characteristics of the response function are expected to affect the FOD computation and the subsequent fiber tracking.

methodsIn this work, we explored the effects of inaccuracies in the shape factors of the response function on the FOD characteristics.

resultsWith simulations, we show that the apparent fiber density could be doubled in the presence of underestimated shape factors in the response functions, whereas the overestimation of the shape factor will cause more spurious peaks in the FOD, especially when the signal-to-noise ratio is below 15. Moreover, crossing fiber populations with a separation angle smaller than 60° were more sensitive to inaccuracies in the response function than fiber populations with more orthogonal separation angles. Results with in vivo data demonstrate angular deviations in the FODs and spurious peaks as a result of modified shape factors of the response function, while the reconstruction of the main parts of fiber bundles is well preserved.

conclusionsThis work sheds light on how specific aspects of the response function shape can affect the estimated FODs, and highlights the importance of a proper calibration/definition of the response function.

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingWhite MatterAlgorithmsBrainCalibrationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assistedapparent fiber density (AFD)constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD)diffusion MRIfiber orientation distribution (FOD)fiber tractography

Identifiers

PMID34128556
PMCPMC9290593
OpenAlexW3171470754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.