Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34128411›Full record

ArticleClinical rehabilitation2021

A prospective study to establish the minimal clinically important difference of the Mini-BESTest in individuals with stroke.

Marla K Beauchamp, Rudy Niebuhr, Patricia Roche, Renata Kirkwood, Kathryn M Sibley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Validation of the Czech adaptation of Mini-BESTest into clinical practice.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marla K BeauchampSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Rudy NiebuhrHealth Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Patricia RocheGeorge & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Renata KirkwoodSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Kathryn M SibleyGeorge & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6212-5437
George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation · CAMcMaster University · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the minimal clinically important difference of the Mini-BESTest in individuals' post-stroke.

designProspective cohort study.

settingOutpatient stroke rehabilitation. SUBJECTS: Fifty outpatients with stroke with a mean (SD) age of 60.8 (9.4).

interventionOutpatients with stroke were assessed with the Mini-BESTest before and after a course of conventional rehabilitation. Rehabilitation sessions occurred one to two times/week for one hour and treatment duration was 1.3-42 weeks (mean (SD) = 17.4(10.6)). MAIN MEASURES: We used a combination of anchor- and distribution-based approaches including a global rating of change in balance scale completed by physiotherapists and patients, the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence, and the optimal cut-point from receiver operating characteristic curves.

resultsThe average (SD) Mini-BESTest score at admission was 18.2 (6.5) and 22.4 (5.2) at discharge (effect size: 0.7) (

conclusionsA change of 4-5 points on the Mini-BEST is required to be perceptible to clinicians and patients, and beyond measurement error. These values can be used to interpret changes in balance in stroke rehabilitation research and practice.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceStroke RehabilitationAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostural BalanceProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveStrokeMCIDMini-BESTestStroke

Identifiers

PMID34128411
PMCPMC8273365
OpenAlexW3169815263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.