ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2021
Decoding location-specific and location-invariant stages of numerosity processing in subitizing.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training attentive individuation leads to visuo-spatial working memory improvement in low-performing older adults: An online study.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Article
- Visual P2p component responds to perceived numerosity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Decoding location-specific and location-invariant stages of numerosity processing in subitizing.The European journal of neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracting the number of objects in perceived scenes is a fundamental cognitive ability. Number processing is proposed to rely on two consecutive stages: an early object location map that captures individuated objects in a location-specific way and a subsequent location-invariant representation that captures numerosity at an abstract level. However, it is unclear whether this framework applies to small numerosities that can be individuated at once ("subitized"). Here, we reanalyzed data from two electroencephalography (EEG) experiments using multivariate pattern decoding to identify location-specific and location-invariant stages of numerosity processing in the subitizing range. In these experiments, one to three targets were presented in the left or right hemifield, which allowed for decoding target numerosity within each hemifield separately (location specific) or across hemifields (location invariant). Experiment 1 indicated the presence of a location-specific stage (180-200 ms after stimulus), followed by a location-invariant stage (300 ms after stimulus). A time-by-channel searchlight analysis revealed that the early location-specific stage is most evident at occipital channels, whereas the late location-invariant stage is most evident at parietal channels. Experiment 2 showed that both location-specific and location-invariant components are engaged only during tasks that explicitly require numerosity processing, ruling out automatic, and passive recording of numerosity. These results suggest that numerosity coding in subitizing is strongly grounded on an attention-based, location-specific stage. This stage overlaps with the subsequent activation of a location-invariant stage, where a full representation of numerosity is finalized. Taken together, our findings provide clear evidence for a temporal and spatial segregation of location-specific and location-invariant numerosity coding of small object numerosities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.