Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34128156›Full record

ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2021

Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?

Ligiane Oliveira Leme, Grazieli Marinheiro Machado, Andrei Antonioni Guedes Fidelis, Ana Luiza Silva Guimarães, José Felipe Warmiling Sprícigo, José Oliveira Carvalho, I Pivato, Maurício Machaim Franco, Margot Alves Nunes Dode

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ligiane Oliveira LemeFederal University of Espírito Santo, Alegre, ES, 29500-000, Brazil.
Grazieli Marinheiro MachadoUniversity of Brasilia, Animal Science, Merk Millipore /Sigma-Aldrich Brasil, São Paulo, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
Andrei Antonioni Guedes FidelisUniversity of Brasilia, Animal Science, Merk Millipore /Sigma-Aldrich Brasil, São Paulo, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
Ana Luiza Silva GuimarãesUniversity of Brasilia, Animal Science, Merk Millipore /Sigma-Aldrich Brasil, São Paulo, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
José Felipe Warmiling SprícigoUniversity of Brasilia, Animal Science, Merk Millipore /Sigma-Aldrich Brasil, São Paulo, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
José Oliveira CarvalhoFederal University of Espírito Santo, Alegre, ES, 29500-000, Brazil.
I PivatoUniversity of Brasilia, Animal Science, Merk Millipore /Sigma-Aldrich Brasil, São Paulo, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
Maurício Machaim FrancoEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, Parque Estação Biológica, W5 Norte Final, Brasília, DF, 70770-900, Brazil.
Margot Alves Nunes DodeUniversity of Brasilia, Animal Science, Merk Millipore /Sigma-Aldrich Brasil, São Paulo, DF, 70910-900, Brazil. margot.dode@embrapa.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1096-0457
Universidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BRBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well-established that in vitro culture affects quality, gene expression, and epigenetic processes in bovine embryos and that trophectoderm cells are the most susceptible to abnormalities. These changes have been reported as the main factors responsible for losses observed after transfer of in vitro-produced embryos. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an in vitro system on bovine embryo transcriptional profiles on D14 of development. Two groups were used-one with embryos produced in vitro until D7 (day 7; VT group) and another with embryos produced in vivo by hormonal stimulation, with embryos collected on D7 (VV group). D7 embryos at similar developmental stages from both treatments were transferred to recipient uteri and recollected on D14. From D14 embryos of both treatments, trophoblast samples were removed by biopsy for sexing and transcriptome analyses. Embryos were sexed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and only males were used for RNA sequencing. In total, 29,005 transcripts were expressed, from which 900 were differentially expressed, but only 29 genes were significantly differentially expressed. In addition, 20 genes were found uniquely for VV and 27 for VT. These findings suggested that although the uterine environment minimized transcriptional differences, it was not able to make trophoblasts from the in vitro embryos similar to the in vivo ones. The few genes exhibiting differences are in control of important events that may be responsible for embryonic losses occurring during the first period of gestation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystCattleEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo TransferEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalRNA-SeqTranscriptomeTrophoblastsConceptus elongationD14 bovine trophoblastGene expression: TrophoblastTrophoblast profile

Identifiers

PMID34128156
OpenAlexW3168370315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.