Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34128137›Full record

SynthesisHead and neck pathology2021

Comparative Analysis Between Dentinogenic Ghost Cell Tumor and Ghost Cell Odontogenic Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Gustavo de Souza Vieira, Pâmella de Pinho Montovani, Rafaela Elvira Rozza-de-Menezes, Karin Soares Gonçalves Cunha, Danielle Castex Conde

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Head and neck pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gustavo de Souza VieiraGraduate Program in Pathology, School of Medicine, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Pâmella de Pinho MontovaniGraduate Program in Pathology, School of Medicine, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Rafaela Elvira Rozza-de-MenezesDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro, Federal Fluminense University, Av. Marquês do Paraná, 303, 4ºandar, sala 01, Centro, Niterói, RJ, 24033-900, Brazil.
Karin Soares Gonçalves CunhaGraduate Program in Pathology, School of Medicine, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Danielle Castex CondeDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro, Federal Fluminense University, Av. Marquês do Paraná, 303, 4ºandar, sala 01, Centro, Niterói, RJ, 24033-900, Brazil. daniellecastex@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8492-9145
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BRHospital Universitário Antônio Pedro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT) and ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma (GCOC) form a spectrum of rare benign and malignant odontogenic neoplasms, respectively. The aim of this study was to perform a comparative systematic review of the clinicopathological, genetic, therapeutic, and prognostic features of DGCT and GCOC. The electronic search was performed until December 2020 on seven electronic databases. Case reports, series, and research studies with enough histopathological criteria for diagnosis and all genomic studies were included. Both DGCT and GCOC showed a male prevalence (p = 0.043), with mandibular and maxillary predilections, respectively (p = 0.008). Peripheral DGCT (DGCTp) affected most elderly people (p < 0.001), and central DGCT (DGCTc) and GCOC occurred mainly in younger individuals. Unilateral enlargement of maxilla or mandible was the most common clinical sign associated with a radiolucent or mixed image. Ameloblastomatous epithelium was often present in both neoplasms. Basaloid and large cells with vesicular nuclei were also frequently seen in GCOC. β-catenin expression and mutations (CTNNB1 gene) were found in DGCT and GCOC. Conservative surgery was mostly used for DGCTp, while radical resection was chosen for DGCTc and GCOC. High recurrence rates were found in DGCTc and GCOC. Metastasis occurred in 16.7% of GCOC cases and the 5-year survival rate was 72.6%. DGCT and GCOC share numerous clinicopathological features and demand a careful histopathological evaluation, considering the overlap features with other odontogenic tumors and the possibility of malignant transformation of DGCT. A strict regular post-operative follow-up is mandatory due to high recurrence rates and metastatic capacity in GCOC.

Indexed as

Age Factorsbeta CateninDNA Copy Number VariationsHumansJaw NeoplasmsKeratinsKi-67 AntigenMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOdontogenic TumorsSex FactorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53beta CateninCTNNB1 protein, humanKeratinsKi-67 AntigenMKI67 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Dentinogenic ghost cell tumorGhost cell odontogenic carcinomaMandibleMaxillaOdontogenic tumors

Identifiers

PMID34128137
PMCPMC8633206
OpenAlexW3166299227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.