ArticlePediatric cardiology2021
Aortic Root Dilation in Patients with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome Without Intracardiac Anomalies.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the Variability of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: The Role of Epigenetic Factors.Genes · 2024Review
- Article
- 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Impact of Genetics in the Treatment of Conotruncal Heart Defects.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Isolated aortic root dilatation - Expanding the cardiac phenotype of 22q11 deletion syndrome.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic root dilation (ARD) has been reported in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) with and without congenital heart defects (CHDs). However, the long-term implications of isolated ARD in 22q11.2DS remain undefined. In this study, we measured aortic root size and estimated the probability of changing between normal aortic root size and ARD during follow up to understand the prevalence, longitudinal course, and clinical risk factors for ARD in patients with 22q11.2DS without intracardiac CHDs. Aortic root size was measured in 251 patients with 432 studies. Forty-one patients (16.3%) had ARD on at least one echocardiogram and the cohort sinus Z-score was increased on the last echocardiogram [mean (1.09, SD 1.24) and median (1.20, min - 1.90 and max 5.40)]. Transition probability analysis showed that 8.1% of patients developed ARD and 45.4% of patients with ARD reverted to normal at the next echocardiogram. The risk of ARD over time was significantly associated with male sex (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.41-6.65; p = 0.004), but not with age or presence of an aortic arch anomaly. Compared to a sinus Z-score ≥ 2, initial Z-score < 2 was associated with 14.3 times lower risk of developing sinus Z-score ≥ 3 at follow up. Sinus Z-score overall decreased by age, and males had a higher Z-score than females (ß = 0.72, SE = 0.14, p < 0.001). Though only a few patients had a Z-score > 4, and patients with initial Z-scores < 2 seem unlikely to develop clinically significant disease, screening practices remain incompletely defined such that periodic evaluation appears warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34128123What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.