ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2021
Objective Comparison of FDA-Approved Breast Implant Products in the USA: 5-Year Update.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Capsular Contracture Rates in Subfascial and Subglandular Breast Augmentation With Smooth vs Textured Implants.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2026Pooled it
- Risk of Recall Among Plastic Surgery Devices Cleared Through the FDA 510(k) Pathway.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- The Best Under Stress: An Analysis of Breast Tissue Expander Response to External Forces.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are currently four companies offering FDA-approved breast implants: Allergan, Sientra, Mentor, and Ideal Implant. In 2015, our paper "Objective Comparison of Commercially Available Breast Implant Devices" sought to provide a unique conceptual framework to better understand the similarities and differences between FDA-approved breast implant products and tissue expanders. This paper uses the same variables, such as fill material, shape, relative dimensions, and surface coating, to aid understanding of both the surgical trainee and the operating surgeon of what devices each company offers, with a focus on how the market has evolved over the ensuing 5 years.
methodsThe product catalogs of each FDA-approved company were carefully explored to determine the current available breast implants and tissue expanders. Subsequently, flow charts were created to provide a clear and objective survey of each companies' offerings, highlighting where there are overlap and deficiencies, and where there has been contraction or growth.
resultsDisruptions to the industry, including both technological innovation and the recognition of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), have caused a significant shift in the details of the available permanent breast implants, breast tissue expanders, sizers, and warranty programs.
conclusionAs it has been in 2015, company jargon and brand names continue to make it challenging to discern the similarities and differences between company devices and programs. This project remained independent of any company's funding, support, or input, making it a uniquely objective and informative survey of the current breast implant market that should assist surgeons in decision-making regarding the breast implant procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.